-
de officiis
- Posts: 2528
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am
Post
by de officiis » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:53 am
A Catapult on the Mexico Border Was Used to Hurl Drugs Into U.S.
Federal officials have dismantled a catapult attached to a fence on the Mexico border that was being used to hurl drugs into America.
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection said Tuesday that the ancient military device was used to fling at least two bundles of marijuana from Mexico into the U.S. last week.
The agency said in a statement that it has seized the drugs, which weighed about 50 pounds combined. Mexican authorities took the disassembled catapult.
And they say we don't need a wall.
I think the forum deserves Monte's analysis as to the efficacy of this device.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25085
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:57 am
Dumbass Mexicans. They could have launched 4x as much, twice as far behind the wall.
90kg = 198lb of weed.
de officiis wrote:And they say we don't need a wall.
It seems that Mexico has discovered Medieval-era technology as well, the bastards...
The wall needs parapets!!
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18695
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:13 am
There's a very simple mathematical equation to explain this...
Trebuchet>wall
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25085
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:16 am
For you, Monte:
-
Otern
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 2:13 am
Post
by Otern » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:19 am
wouldn't a drone be even more effective?
It's smaller than a trebuchet, easier to transport, and they have longer range.
Modern technology is a huge threat to the artillery oriented drug smuggling workers.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25085
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:21 am
Otern wrote:wouldn't a drone be even more effective?
It's smaller than a trebuchet, easier to transport, and they have longer range.
Modern technology is a huge threat to the artillery oriented drug smuggling workers.
Shit... gonna need another $20 billion.
-
Calculus Man
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:22 pm
Post
by Calculus Man » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:32 am
Montegriffo wrote:There's a very simple mathematical equation to explain this...
Trebuchet>wall
...that's literally not even an equation...
Math>Montegriffo
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18695
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:37 am
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25085
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:39 am
You shut your whore mouth.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18695
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:46 am
Calculus Man wrote:Montegriffo wrote:There's a very simple mathematical equation to explain this...
Trebuchet>wall
...that's literally not even an equation...
Math>Montegriffo
oops
I meant "formula"
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
