What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25085
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:56 am

jbird4049 wrote:
BjornP wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06 ... in-us.html

But I'm sure that if they just vet even more extremely against those seven countries, the US won't have any Islamic terrorist attacks, at all.. :whistle:
Of course! Are you some sort of terrorist lover?

:)
.
Wait, do we hate him for being a terrorist-lover, socialist, or just beta this week?

Here comes StA to clear it up for us. ;)
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
jbird4049
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:56 pm

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by jbird4049 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:54 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
jbird4049 wrote:
BjornP wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06 ... in-us.html

But I'm sure that if they just vet even more extremely against those seven countries, the US won't have any Islamic terrorist attacks, at all.. :whistle:
Of course! Are you some sort of terrorist lover?

:)
.
Wait, do we hate him for being a terrorist-lover, socialist, or just beta this week?

Here comes StA to clear it up for us. ;)
All of the above?
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

boethius
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:56 pm

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by boethius » Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:59 pm

To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
Still got my foreskin thanks for asking. - Montegriffo.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14719
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by The Conservative » Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:53 pm

boethius wrote:To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
That is one image I didn't need to get in my head...
#NotOneRedCent

boethius
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:56 pm

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by boethius » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:23 am

The Conservative wrote:
boethius wrote:To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
That is one image I didn't need to get in my head...
That's why you're not as fun at parties.
Still got my foreskin thanks for asking. - Montegriffo.

atanamis
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:29 am

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by atanamis » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:41 am

So if you are asking an honest question, it would be whether the vetting being done by President Obama was sufficient. Of this list, 18 were in the country prior to 2001, one entered in 2002, two more in 2009, and one in 2010. The data doesn't show when the rest entered, but another 15 had their charge date prior to 2002, and yet ANOTHER 17 before 2008. There are only 14 who were charged during Obama's time in office who were not documented in this file as already being in the country, the latest of who was charged in 2011. NONE of these are shown to be recent refugees. I'm sorry, but as evidence that the rigorous vetting being done was insufficient this data is absolute crap. Given that there are thousands of interpreters who worked closely with US troops and have been thoroughly vetted by both the military and by immigration, and who are being actively hunted and killed by Isis, but whom we are unwilling to grant visas, I find claims that the worry is about "vetting" to be a very dishonest one.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:42 am

boethius wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
boethius wrote:To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
That is one image I didn't need to get in my head...
That's why you're not as fun at parties.

If he wears that Fallout coat, we will have to toss him off the rooftop, though.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14719
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by The Conservative » Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:14 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
boethius wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
That is one image I didn't need to get in my head...
That's why you're not as fun at parties.

If he wears that Fallout coat, we will have to toss him off the rooftop, though.
If you can get me on the roof in the first place, that's the nice thing about those jackets, they can hide a lot of nasty surprises :evil:
#NotOneRedCent

apeman
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by apeman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:26 pm

The Conservative wrote:If you can get me on the roof in the first place, that's the nice thing about those jackets, they can hide a lot of nasty surprises :evil:
So its a Magic Coat of Sneaking, huh.

I thought it was merely a magic coat of butt invasion +3.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14719
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: What would you rather have 72 Virgins or 72 Terrorists?

Post by The Conservative » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:11 pm

apeman wrote:
The Conservative wrote:If you can get me on the roof in the first place, that's the nice thing about those jackets, they can hide a lot of nasty surprises :evil:
So its a Magic Coat of Sneaking, huh.

I thought it was merely a magic coat of butt invasion +3.
No that's more like what it conseals, which would be a few daggers, a pistol, and one to two other things that I'll leave as a surprise.
#NotOneRedCent