Maybe it is because the government is really in bed with white nationalists. Maybe it is because Elohim was working with the Illuminati.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 6:34 pmHanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 6:30 pmA failure to make a case, but not a failure to protect the presumption of innocence.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 6:15 pm
Well if a group of people financed or provided any support for a terror attack that killed a lot of other people (targeted a day care center, really), and the state failed to make a case against them, then that would be a failure.
I mean.. I am already long over the illusion of having any justice in this country. If somebody did that to my child, I am going Punisher on them if the state doesn't do anything.
Arrows will often pass the guilty by to slay the innocent. Take it up with God.
It's still a failure. I am not sure why you would object to that characterization. The state failing to prosecute a terrorist and murderer failed at its job. The presumption of innocence implies that we make the state's job very difficult, not excuse failure. If they failed at something that big, I would like to know why.
Asking "why" the state couldn't make a case with the assumption that there is some sinister explanation is just begging the question, and leads one inexorably down the path of paranoid conspiracy.
The fact that the presumption of innocence will sometimes protect the guilty is baked into the cake of protecting civil liberties.