This is your team now. This is all you. I could have had an agreement to disagree but now you have become some kind of idiot.Penner wrote:
Wear your teams badge with pride faggot
This is your team now. This is all you. I could have had an agreement to disagree but now you have become some kind of idiot.Penner wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:This is your team now. This is all you. I could have had an agreement to disagree but now you have become some kind of idiot.Penner wrote:
Wear your teams badge with pride faggot
Seriously though FCC is the best, when it's actually working, to regulate the ISPs. As with the IPS monopolies well that happened before NN.TheReal_ND wrote:Well I can agree with you there PenPen. I agree the ISP's are out of hand. And it happened under NN to boot. Yes I agree but there are ways to fuck them back by simply not using Comcast.
I don't.
Also, I simply don't trust the FCC to regulate trade. That is literally not their job. And even if it were under NN well..... they are fired mein dude
FCC/Gov't can stop monopolies if they want to, stifling creativity is not what they are meant to do.Viktorthepirate wrote:That's a pretty broad argument. Specifically speaking, how is net neutrality stifling creativity? Monopolies do the same thing.Fife wrote:Here's a good piece I ran across this morning sticking to actual economics, utilizing Hayek to demonstrate the shit-world we would have been promised if not for Trump beating that murderous old drunken bitch.
Net Neutrality And The Problem With “Experts”
Central planning is Cuban and Venezuelan bullshit. We had a close shave -- Thank Providence for Trump.Regulating the internet via the FCC, of course, thoroughly prevents innovators, consumers, and producers from taking advantage of the experience and knowledge of those who are actually working in the marketplace.
This isn’t a problem, apparently, for those who insist that government must dictate to consumers and producers alike. After all, we have “experts.”
Unfortunately, when it comes to something as complex and non-clinical as a functioning market, “experts” of the type employed by government panels are of little help. Hayek continues:
Today it is almost heresy to suggest that scientific knowledge is not the sum of all knowledge. But a little reflection will show that there is beyond question a body of very important but unorganized knowledge which cannot possibly be called scientific in the sense of knowledge of general rules: the knowledge of the particular circumstances of time and place. It is with respect to this that practically every individual has some advantage over all others because he possesses unique information of which beneficial use might be made, but of which use can be made only if the decisions depending on it are left to him or are made with his active coöperation.
Creativity is bred from competition, there isn't any.
Butthurt much?Speaker to Animals wrote:Trump fucked over his own voters. There is NO WAY you can spin this in favor of him. This was the most stupid act he has done since taking the oath of office.
Trump is in the White House because of rural voters for the most part -- the very people who are going to get fucked over hard by this. Most of Trump's America are living in areas with only one broadband choice. The people he needs to turn out in future elections are left wondering what was the fucking point.
The Conservative wrote:Butthurt much?Speaker to Animals wrote:Trump fucked over his own voters. There is NO WAY you can spin this in favor of him. This was the most stupid act he has done since taking the oath of office.
Trump is in the White House because of rural voters for the most part -- the very people who are going to get fucked over hard by this. Most of Trump's America are living in areas with only one broadband choice. The people he needs to turn out in future elections are left wondering what was the fucking point.