Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Penner
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by Penner » Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:30 pm

Ph64 wrote:
Penner wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Ahhh... now, do we go nothingburger here, or pretend that we Hillary just sabotaged the entire balance of MAD?
Only after we spend taxpayers' money for the investigation and then start all over because the GOP is reaching for this one. Didn't even Session said that there is no evidence and/or not enough evidence of wrongdoing to even start an investigation?
Who the heck needs evidence? As long as their are multiple women with accusations of wrongdoing... #believewomen, you have no reason to question it. Evidence be damned.
First, you have accounts of MULTIPLE women stating basically the same story about one person then you have this conspiracy theory (which is where it is as of now, btw) with really no evidence, currently, to back up your claim(s). Sessions even said this and the guy is literally a Trump appointee and Trump's (current) AG.

I don't get it why do guys have this obsession with Clinton? Why not someone else and actually do something decent? When Benghazi came up you guys literally scuttled the investigation and started going after Clinton- it leads to nowhere. Which is where this is going.

Also, all those women with accusations really can't really force a criminal investigation on partisan matters nor any criminal charges in most of these cases, because of statute of limitations, and the ones that can are being investigated as we speak.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:37 pm

Penner wrote:
Ph64 wrote:
Penner wrote:
Only after we spend taxpayers' money for the investigation and then start all over because the GOP is reaching for this one. Didn't even Session said that there is no evidence and/or not enough evidence of wrongdoing to even start an investigation?
Who the heck needs evidence? As long as their are multiple women with accusations of wrongdoing... #believewomen, you have no reason to question it. Evidence be damned.
First, you have accounts of MULTIPLE women stating basically the same story about one person then you have this conspiracy theory (which is where it is as of now, btw) with really no evidence, currently, to back up your claim(s). Sessions even said this and the guy is literally a Trump appointee and Trump's (current) AG.

I don't get it why do guys have this obsession with Clinton? Why not someone else and actually do something decent? When Benghazi came up you guys literally scuttled the investigation and started going after Clinton- it leads to nowhere. Which is where this is going.

Also, all those women with accusations really can't really force a criminal investigation on partisan matters nor any criminal charges in most of these cases, because of statute of limitations, and the ones that can are being investigated as we speak.
We also have multiple examples of rape hoaxes where women coordinated to destroy an innocent man. We even see women just copycatting the original allegations to get in on the action. We have seen women engaging in a private SMS group to coordinate their lies. We have seen women forging yearbooks to make it seem like there was some relationship between them and the accused. We have seen women even harming themselves to make it appear as though the man beat and raped them.

Do you not realize that most of these stories turned out to be rape hoaxes??

Sorry, but I have copious examples of why I ought NOT believe these women without substantive proof.

Penner
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by Penner » Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:55 pm

Most of those "hoax" usually ends up as either unprovable which only means that a rape may or may not have happened but not to the person who was first accused. Although, red flags should come up around a person who has MULTIPLE women telling basically the same kind of story.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:57 pm

No, they end up literally hoaxes, Penner.

Multiple women telling the same story means fuck all. Multiple women can copycat one another, and we have already seen multiple women coordinating their lies with the Gomeshi trial as one example. Fuck off.

I will not destroy a man's life just because women decide to make baseless allegations years after the alleged offense. I have seen far, far too many lies to fall for that stupid bullshit. So have many other men.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:11 pm

Nunes says he will bring Mueller in for questiong on Muellers involvement in Uranium One. :lol: :dance: :dance: :dance:


26 min mark, but the whole thing is good
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by C-Mag » Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:51 pm

Image
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Uranium One: $$$ from Russia

Post by Okeefenokee » Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:12 pm

C-Mag wrote:Image
Twitter is such cancer.

They do this shit openly all the time now.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751