Weren't you threatening to kick off if Clinton won? What are you complaining about anyway since you gave up on the United States and your fellow citizens a long time ago.Speaker to Animals wrote:The fakestream media continues to call violent rioters "protesters". I really hate these fucking people at this point.
Yes. They're protecting the greater good of the community.C-Mag wrote:Oh, I think we all understand the tactic. But are the political leaders and police leaders doing their job when they just allow the property destruction and physical attacks on law abiding citizens ?GrumpyCatFace wrote:I'm here, just watching in amazement.
The same old mistakes, replayed, over and over... There is no escalation without resistance - that's why the cops stood down. Let the riot burn itself out, arrest people damaging the storefronts and whatnot.
Leave that situation to our totally-not-virtue-signalling tough-ass, cud-chewin' Right, beat them all down, etc, and you incite massive violence everywhere. And it will happen.
Over and over again...
One moron walking into that firestorm with his magical hat got beaten and died. No homes were invaded, and it didn't spread. That's about the best possible case for this situation.
Protect and Serve ?????
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Weren't you threatening to kick off if Clinton won? What are you complaining about anyway since you gave up on the United States and your fellow citizens a long time ago.Speaker to Animals wrote:The fakestream media continues to call violent rioters "protesters". I really hate these fucking people at this point.
Petition big papa Trump to rain hellfire down on some Berkeley trust fund kids ya big baby.
The Left are OK with casualties, C-Mag. They're Collectivist scum. They're up in their Ivory Tower, while their political adversaries are getting murdered in the street.C-Mag wrote:
Oh, I think we all understand the tactic. But are the political leaders and police leaders doing their job when they just allow the property destruction and physical attacks on law abiding citizens ?
Protect and Serve ?????
So he's a moron because he was not bending knee to the violent anarchists? Yes, if only he had cowered in his bathroom. Do not disparage him because he had the brass to actually go out in support of his beliefs and adhere to non-violence, which you give lip-service to.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I'm here, just watching in amazement.
The same old mistakes, replayed, over and over... There is no escalation without resistance - that's why the cops stood down. Let the riot burn itself out, arrest people damaging the storefronts and whatnot.
Leave that situation to our totally-not-virtue-signalling tough-ass, cud-chewin' Right, beat them all down, etc, and you incite massive violence everywhere. And it will happen.
Over and over again...
One moron walking into that firestorm with his magical hat got beaten and died. No homes were invaded, and it didn't spread. That's about the best possible case for this situation.
^^^This is what cowardly nationalists are really about. They just want to frame everything in terms of friend or foe, and they don't care about creating a United States that works for all citizens.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Weren't you threatening to kick off if Clinton won? What are you complaining about anyway since you gave up on the United States and your fellow citizens a long time ago.Speaker to Animals wrote:The fakestream media continues to call violent rioters "protesters". I really hate these fucking people at this point.
Petition big papa Trump to rain hellfire down on some Berkeley trust fund kids ya big baby.
^^^ This is what the left is really about. They don't care. They love this shit. For them, this has always been a war against their fellow Americans.
Time to take them for their word and treat them as the enemies they are.
We are not the ones beating innocent people to death with metal poles and punching women in the face for wearing the wrong hat.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:^^^This is what cowardly nationalists are really about. They just want to frame everything in terms of friend or foe, and they don't care about creating a United States that works for all citizens.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Weren't you threatening to kick off if Clinton won? What are you complaining about anyway since you gave up on the United States and your fellow citizens a long time ago.
Petition big papa Trump to rain hellfire down on some Berkeley trust fund kids ya big baby.
^^^ This is what the left is really about. They don't care. They love this shit. For them, this has always been a war against their fellow Americans.
Time to take them for their word and treat them as the enemies they are.
Don't fall for it.
Cowardly? How many people have to be murdered in the street by ONE SIDE before you'll get it through your head that sometimes it's OK to defend oneself when faced with actual violence? Cowardice is sitting down and doing nothing.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:^^^This is what cowardly nationalists are really about. They just want to frame everything in terms of friend or foe, and they don't care about creating a United States that works for all citizens.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Weren't you threatening to kick off if Clinton won? What are you complaining about anyway since you gave up on the United States and your fellow citizens a long time ago.
Petition big papa Trump to rain hellfire down on some Berkeley trust fund kids ya big baby.
^^^ This is what the left is really about. They don't care. They love this shit. For them, this has always been a war against their fellow Americans.
Time to take them for their word and treat them as the enemies they are.
Don't fall for it.
Yes, he was. If you see a violent riot taking place, you do not put on the other side's colors and walk toward it, unless you're heading an army. That's just idiotic. Maybe you can paint him as some kind of idealistic martyr for the cause (that doesn't exist), but that's the best case.Xenophon wrote:So he's a moron because he was not bending knee to the violent anarchists? Yes, if only he had cowered in his bathroom. Do not disparage him because he had the brass to actually go out in support of his beliefs and adhere to non-violence, which you give lip-service to.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I'm here, just watching in amazement.
The same old mistakes, replayed, over and over... There is no escalation without resistance - that's why the cops stood down. Let the riot burn itself out, arrest people damaging the storefronts and whatnot.
Leave that situation to our totally-not-virtue-signalling tough-ass, cud-chewin' Right, beat them all down, etc, and you incite massive violence everywhere. And it will happen.
Over and over again...
One moron walking into that firestorm with his magical hat got beaten and died. No homes were invaded, and it didn't spread. That's about the best possible case for this situation.
You're not talking about defense though, are you? You and the other knucklebrains here are discussing some sort of ideological 'cleansing' of the so-called "other side". How do you think that works out? We've only done it about 1,000 times through history, yet it keeps happening - and being supported on a history forum! I'm absolutely amazed right now..Xenophon wrote:Cowardly? How many people have to be murdered in the street by ONE SIDE before you'll get it through your head that sometimes it's OK to defend oneself when faced with actual violence? Cowardice is sitting down and doing nothing.
Absolution Style by Premium phpBB Styles
