Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by TheReal_ND » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:55 pm

What was Bjorn's again?

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by K@th » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:55 pm

MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
True story.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:00 pm

MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.

When you subsidize bad parenting by only one gender, you will end up with a fuck ton of bad parents from that gender, as we now see with the plague of single motherhood, which by definition is bad parenting.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Okeefenokee » Sat Jan 28, 2017 1:07 pm

Fife wrote:
Kath wrote:My wet dream for SCOTUS is to make the 4th Amendment relevant again. And civil forfeiture must die.
Well I'm certainly on board with all that.

One of the uncountable losses of the destruction of the DCF was the links I worked up on the Mosaic Theory.

Your 4th amendment is on life 12.75, or thereabouts.

Scientists are making genetically modified cyborg dragonflies
https://www.reference.com/science/eats- ... 169284bbe9
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:54 am

Well, the nomination is coming Tuesday now.

Trump cold re-animate O.W. Holmes, Jr., nominate him, and the DNC would call him Judge Hitler. It mattes not who he appoints.

So, the really interesting dynamic becomes the Turtle and the neocons vs. Trump on whether to "go nuclear."

The most interesting stuff so far is right around the corner.

I have doubts about how "sure" it is to go nuclear, at least in Round One.

Why the Supreme Court fight is sure to go nuclear

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:38 am

Kath wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
True story.

Not according to the US Judicial System. Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by K@th » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:42 am

C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:43 am

Kath wrote:
C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.

That's total horseshit, Kath. You are talking about men giving up and losing their children after losing everything. I have been through the process. the judge will NEVER just make a decision like that in a contested divorce. It will drag on for years and year, and the man will have to pay all legal fees, until he is destitute and can no longer defend himself. Then it's over.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:45 am

Kath wrote:
C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.

Somewhere around 100% of that post is fake news.

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by K@th » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:58 am

Fife wrote: Somewhere around 100% of that post is fake news.
Sorry, I'm not a lawyer. Can you translate below?
Courts are changing as well; in the small percentage (5 percent) of custody cases that do go to litigation, judges are now more inclined to disregard gender and look at who's the better parent, says Gary Nickelson, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. "
http://www.newsweek.com/divorce-new-rul ... tody-83545
Account abandoned.