2018 Mid-Term Elections

[Zlaxer]

I don't want to put words in Speakers mouth, but I get the impression he wasn't saying nuclear weaponry was a way to eliminate election fraud. It seemed like he was saying we would get better election results if eliminated valid democratic voters clustered in cities.

FIFY:

We would get non-genocidal election results if the urban electorate were not a factor in elections.

You seem very desperate to paint me as somebody who actually wants to exterminate cities. That says more about the poverty of your position than anything else.

My actual statement was to the effect that, if white urban liberals continue to attempt to genocide the rest of us along with themselves, the rest of us will destroy them first. The self-defense against genocide aspect is irrelevant to you probably because you want the genocide.

I understand your position. It isn't exactly opaque. The things urban democrats vote for are bad, and those bad things wouldn't get voted for if they didn't exist. It isn't rocket science.
The point is: if you are just getting rid of people who vote for the wrong stuff, you don't need voting at all. Just go full Fife, and post cute memes about how democracy is lame, and be done with it.

Founders gave us a republic because Democracy is lame...and dangerous...but DNC has undone most of the protections over the last 70 years...

Proles should not be allowed to vote.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Oooooooooh...you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.

We're not talking about "liberals" - It's collectivism....which is the exact opposite of liberalism....and yes...collectivism is a cancer that needs to be expunged from this world.

Right, without voting, since you can just use nukes.

You all barely even have the courage of your convictions for all your tough talk about 'removing the cancer of blah blah blah.'

You all don't think democracy works as long as people you disagree with exist, so they should be liquidated.

Christ, nut up already fellas. It is gonna take sterner stuff than you have displayed here to fix this collectivist problem.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

FIFY:

We would get non-genocidal election results if the urban electorate were not a factor in elections.

You seem very desperate to paint me as somebody who actually wants to exterminate cities. That says more about the poverty of your position than anything else.

My actual statement was to the effect that, if white urban liberals continue to attempt to genocide the rest of us along with themselves, the rest of us will destroy them first. The self-defense against genocide aspect is irrelevant to you probably because you want the genocide.

I understand your position. It isn't exactly opaque. The things urban democrats vote for are bad, and those bad things wouldn't get voted for if they didn't exist. It isn't rocket science.
The point is: if you are just getting rid of people who vote for the wrong stuff, you don't need voting at all. Just go full Fife, and post cute memes about how democracy is lame, and be done with it.

Founders gave us a republic because Democracy is lame...and dangerous...but DNC has undone most of the protections over the last 70 years...

Proles should not be allowed to vote.

Which brings me back to my first point: talking about nuking cities to improve national elections is silly.

[Zlaxer]

Oooooooooh...you have doubled down on Zlaxer's cancer analogy. Liberals are bad. Cancer is bad. Instead of letting them vote, they should be removed, like cancer.

We're not talking about "liberals" - It's collectivism....which is the exact opposite of liberalism....and yes...collectivism is a cancer that needs to be expunged from this world.

Right, without voting, since you can just use nukes.

When the government crosses the line and becomes the tyrant - there's no more point to voting. System is broke....and it might makes right - Fucking natural law until with the stronger force prevails and is rewarded with the right to remake society as they see fit - We're fucking close to that line.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

We're not talking about "liberals" - It's collectivism....which is the exact opposite of liberalism....and yes...collectivism is a cancer that needs to be expunged from this world.

Right, without voting, since you can just use nukes.

When the government crosses the line and becomes the tyrant - there's no more point to voting. System is broke....and it might makes right - Fucking natural law until with the stronger force being rewarded with the right to remake society as they see fit - We're fucking close to that line.

Nothing tyrant-y about nuking the opposition. Unless you know of some privately owned pure-liberty-nukes, it is, presumably, organs of the government nuking their own population in this glorious battle to wrestle freedom back from bad voting habits.

[Zlaxer]

Which brings me back to my first point: talking about nuking cities to improve national elections is silly.

Is it now....

[Zlaxer]

__

[Fife]

You all are sure tokin it up in the ole dorm room this morning.

With one or a couple of notable exceptions, I don't think anybody here is talking about *actual IRL* nuclear/chemical/bio/&c. warfare against the federal city and/or NY/LA/SF/south FLA/&c.

Letting them all walk away from the rest of the country that still has a chance at survival peacefully, however; if nukes are a metaphor of some kind for that process, then the silos are hot, broheims.

The middle path, between active warfare and a peaceful divorce, has been elusive.

[Speaker to Animals]

I don't want to put words in Speakers mouth, but I get the impression he wasn't saying nuclear weaponry was a way to eliminate election fraud. It seemed like he was saying we would get better election results if eliminated valid democratic voters clustered in cities.

FIFY:

We would get non-genocidal election results if the urban electorate were not a factor in elections.

You seem very desperate to paint me as somebody who actually wants to exterminate cities. That says more about the poverty of your position than anything else.

My actual statement was to the effect that, if white urban liberals continue to attempt to genocide the rest of us along with themselves, the rest of us will destroy them first. The self-defense against genocide aspect is irrelevant to you probably because you want the genocide.

I understand your position. It isn't exactly opaque. The things urban democrats vote for are bad, and those bad things wouldn't get voted for if they didn't exist. It isn't rocket science.
The point is: if you are just getting rid of people who vote for the wrong stuff, you don't need voting at all. Just go full Fife, and post cute memes about how democracy is lame, and be done with it.

You are still prattling on as if I want to eliminate urban liberals.

[Zlaxer]

The middle path, between active warfare and a peaceful divorce, has been elusive.

All I'm saying is that the Left is risking civil strife by imposing their will which is a read line for many Americans....And they won't let the country folk be...but you know this Fife....The Left always seeks total domination...always has...and always will.....they simply hate it when people reject their system....

People have fought over much less....

And no - I have no plans nor am calling for anyone to actually nuke a city.