UK election

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK election

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:34 pm

The Conservative Party has been criticised after one of its official Twitter accounts was rebranded as a fact-checking service.

The Conservative Campaign Headquarters press office renamed its account "factcheckUK" for the duration of Tuesday evening's debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn.

Those in charge of the account then wrote commentary on the Labour Party leader's statements and retweeted messages supporting Mr Johnson.But some raised concerns it could be mistaken for independent fact checkers Full Fact, which described the Tory move as "inappropriate and misleading".

Labour's David Lammy called for the Electoral Commission to investigate, saying it showed "what disdain this party and this government has for the truth".A spokesperson for the Electoral Commission said: "Voters are entitled to transparency and integrity from campaigners in the lead up to an election, so they have the information they need to decide for themselves how to vote.

"The Electoral Commission seeks to deliver transparency to the public through the political finance rules; while we do not have a role in regulating election campaign content, we repeat our call to all campaigners to undertake their vital role responsibly and to support campaigning transparency."
https://news.sky.com/story/tories-criti ... e-11865342
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK election

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:36 pm

There has been widespread condemnation for the Tory Party for the decision to change the name of their Twitter press account to ‘RedHotNudes’ for the duration of the leaders’ debate.

Although it retained the familiar @CCHQPress Twitter Handle, the name had been changed along with the header photo, which had been replaced with what seemed to be a screengrab of a Babestation girl.

The thumbnail appeared to have been changed to the head of a penis, but could have been Sajid Javid, it’s not always easy to tell.

“It’s a ruddy disgrace is what it is,” explained sexual pervert Simon Williams.

“The wife wanted to watch this debate lark, so I thought I’d spend a pleasant hour looking at naked people engaged in consensual acts on the Internet.

“Imagine my disappointment at clicking on this new Twitter RedHotNudes profile only to be confronted with a series of lies about Brexit and a video about Boris Johnson making a cup of tea whilst lying.

“It shouldn’t be allowed.”

The Tories denied that it was another in a long line of duplicitous and unpleasant tricks to spread their propaganda.

“Just a bit of harmless fun,” explained Michael Gove, the Tory Party House Elf.

“I’m sure that most people would have found a genuine twitter porn account.

“If not, they should have asked. If there’s one thing Tories know, it’s where to find porn.”

The Tory Party press account was changed back to its familiar branding for several hours before being replaced with the name -‘Vote Tory or Santa won’t bring you presents’ – and a picture of Father Christmas with a ‘vote Tory’ sticker on his sleigh.
https://newsthump.com/2019/11/20/tory-p ... dhotnudes/
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: UK election

Post by Ph64 » Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:58 pm

The Conservative Campaign Headquarters press office renamed its account "factcheckUK" for the duration of Tuesday evening's debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn.
Interesting, because you might think the "conservative campaign HQ press office" Twitter handle might be "@CCHQPress", but then your next post quotes...
There has been widespread condemnation for the Tory Party for the decision to change the name of their Twitter press account to ‘RedHotNudes’ for the duration of the leaders’ debate.

Although it retained the familiar @CCHQPress Twitter Handle, the name had been changed along with the header photo, which had been replaced with what seemed to be a screengrab of a Babestation girl.
Soooo... Which am I supposed to believe? They left the @handle but changed the name to "RedHotNudes"... "for the duration of the debate", or they renamed it to "factcheckUK" for the duration?

Or should I just figure they're both fake news?
"People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome."

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK election

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:04 pm

Ph64 wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:58 pm
The Conservative Campaign Headquarters press office renamed its account "factcheckUK" for the duration of Tuesday evening's debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn.
Interesting, because you might think the "conservative campaign HQ press office" Twitter handle might be "@CCHQPress", but then your next post quotes...
There has been widespread condemnation for the Tory Party for the decision to change the name of their Twitter press account to ‘RedHotNudes’ for the duration of the leaders’ debate.

Although it retained the familiar @CCHQPress Twitter Handle, the name had been changed along with the header photo, which had been replaced with what seemed to be a screengrab of a Babestation girl.
Soooo... Which am I supposed to believe? They left the @handle but changed the name to "RedHotNudes"... "for the duration of the debate", or they renamed it to "factcheckUK" for the duration?

Or should I just figure they're both fake news?
One story is real the other is satire. I'll leave you to guess which is which.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: UK election

Post by The Conservative » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:06 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:04 pm
Ph64 wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:58 pm
The Conservative Campaign Headquarters press office renamed its account "factcheckUK" for the duration of Tuesday evening's debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn.
Interesting, because you might think the "conservative campaign HQ press office" Twitter handle might be "@CCHQPress", but then your next post quotes...
There has been widespread condemnation for the Tory Party for the decision to change the name of their Twitter press account to ‘RedHotNudes’ for the duration of the leaders’ debate.

Although it retained the familiar @CCHQPress Twitter Handle, the name had been changed along with the header photo, which had been replaced with what seemed to be a screengrab of a Babestation girl.
Soooo... Which am I supposed to believe? They left the @handle but changed the name to "RedHotNudes"... "for the duration of the debate", or they renamed it to "factcheckUK" for the duration?

Or should I just figure they're both fake news?
One story is real the other is satire. I'll leave you to guess which is which.
The one you think is real is satire for the entire world?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK election

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:20 pm

The Conservative wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:06 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:04 pm
Ph64 wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:58 pm


Interesting, because you might think the "conservative campaign HQ press office" Twitter handle might be "@CCHQPress", but then your next post quotes...



Soooo... Which am I supposed to believe? They left the @handle but changed the name to "RedHotNudes"... "for the duration of the debate", or they renamed it to "factcheckUK" for the duration?

Or should I just figure they're both fake news?
One story is real the other is satire. I'll leave you to guess which is which.
The one you think is real is satire for the entire world?
I don't think it's real, I know it is. They haven't denied it and Twitter has admonished them for it.

You're right though, British politics is a joke right now.
A lying, cheating, Islamophobic fop on one side and an anti-Semitic, IRA excusing, Marxist twat on the other.

It's all good for the Libs and Greens though.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: UK election

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:20 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:20 pm
IRA excusing, Marxist twat on the other.
I'd side with the Republicans if they would side against the New Marxists.

The Orange & Green together against the Woke in London town.

God save Ireland.

Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK election

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:01 pm

Smitty-48 wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:20 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:20 pm
IRA excusing, Marxist twat on the other.
I'd side with the Republicans if they would side against the New Marxists.

The Orange & Green together against the Woke in London town.

God save Ireland.

The men who tried to kill the Baroness?
I call your bluff.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: UK election

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:08 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:01 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:20 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:20 pm
IRA excusing, Marxist twat on the other.
I'd side with the Republicans if they would side against the New Marxists.

The Orange & Green together against the Woke in London town.

God save Ireland.

The men who tried to kill the Baroness?
I call your bluff.
The Baroness is long dead, and it is the Londoner Lefties who hate her.

Let's bury the hatchet, Fenians, we have a common enemy, to the lampposts with the Woke, fetch the rope.

Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK election

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:37 pm

Smitty-48 wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:08 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:01 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:20 pm


I'd side with the Republicans if they would side against the New Marxists.

The Orange & Green together against the Woke in London town.

God save Ireland.

The men who tried to kill the Baroness?
I call your bluff.
The Baroness is long dead, and it is the Londoner Lefties who hate her.

Let's bury the hatchet, Fenians, we have a common enemy, to the lampposts with the Woke, fetch the rope.

You are forgetting that the Provos are a bunch of radical commies themselves. It's the right-wing nut jobs in the DUP that they want to hang from the nearest stout oak.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image