UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

[StCapps]

Merely offensive is not a crime. The law clearly states that it has to be grossly offensive.
Asking a Nazi saluting dog if he wants to gas the Jews 30 times is on a whole different level of offensive compared to a picture of a chimp in a top hat.
Nuances matter.

Yes, Monty. Nuances matter. Like the fact that the guy teaching his dog to salute like a Nazi did so as a joke, and the punchline of the joke was to make this cute dog look like something completely horrible, and to claim that is offensive is to defend Nazis. Then there is the fact that the punchline of the tweet you are defending here is that blacks are not human beings.

Fucking amazing.

Shame you are not consistent enough to have said the same thing about Rosanne Barr when she compared a black woman to an ape.

She looks like that ape chick from planet of the apes faggot. It's not a race thing, it's a separated at birth thing. Not everyone with african heritage looks like they are from the planet of the apes, but VJ certainly does.

[Montegriffo]

Lol ‘grossly offensive’ is your protection from overreach. That’s pretty sad.

No, the courts are protection from overreach.
Sad is when you have no trust in your legal system.

You have far too much faith in courts to determine what is and isn't "grossly offensive", they don't protect fuck, it's a kangaroo court witch trial. Sad that you trust courts to determine what is and isn't free speech when they routinely show they don't have a god damn clue, what a dumbass.

I feel very sorry for you if you live in a country with a completely untrustworthy legal system.

[StCapps]

No, the courts are protection from overreach.
Sad is when you have no trust in your legal system.

You have far too much faith in courts to determine what is and isn't "grossly offensive", they don't protect fuck, it's a kangaroo court witch trial. Sad that you trust courts to determine what is and isn't free speech when they routinely show they don't have a god damn clue, what a dumbass.

I feel very sorry for you if you live in a country with a completely untrustworthy legal system.

Indeed, and your country also has an untrustworthy legal system when it comes to free speech. You guys are even worse, I feel sorry for you, especially when you hate free speech so much you trust them for no good reason.

[Montegriffo]

Yes, Monty. Nuances matter. Like the fact that the guy teaching his dog to salute like a Nazi did so as a joke, and the punchline of the joke was to make this cute dog look like something completely horrible, and to claim that is offensive is to defend Nazis. Then there is the fact that the punchline of the tweet you are defending here is that blacks are not human beings.

Fucking amazing.

Shame you are not consistent enough to have said the same thing about Rosanne Barr when she compared a black woman to an ape.

She looks like that ape chick from planet of the apes faggot. It's not a race thing, it's a separated at birth thing. Not everyone with african heritage looks like they are from the planet of the apes, but VJ certainly does.

So you accept Rosanne's explanation but not Danny Baker's.
There's a word for that...

[StCapps]

Shame you are not consistent enough to have said the same thing about Rosanne Barr when she compared a black woman to an ape.

She looks like that ape chick from planet of the apes faggot. It's not a race thing, it's a separated at birth thing. Not everyone with african heritage looks like they are from the planet of the apes, but VJ certainly does.

So you accept Rosanne's explanation but not Danny Baker's.
There's a word for that...

When did I say I don't accept Danny Baker's explanation? You're the one that doesn't accept explanations and thinks there should be a law against "grossly offensive" tweets, stop projecting.

A dog giving the Nazi salute? The only explanation is "RACIST!", oh wait, he says it's a joke? Fuck him anyway, I don't like his politics, "ILLEGAL!"

[clubgop]

Lol ‘grossly offensive’ is your protection from overreach. That’s pretty sad.

No, the courts are protection from overreach.
Sad is when you have no trust in your legal system.

You have far too much faith in courts to determine what is and isn't "grossly offensive", they don't protect fuck, it's a kangaroo court witch trial. Sad that you trust courts to determine what is and isn't free speech when they routinely show they don't have a god damn clue, what a dumbass.

When Sharia takes Britain he is going to scream his trust in the court all the down from whatever building they throw him off.

[Speaker to Animals]

Merely offensive is not a crime. The law clearly states that it has to be grossly offensive.
Asking a Nazi saluting dog if he wants to gas the Jews 30 times is on a whole different level of offensive compared to a picture of a chimp in a top hat.
Nuances matter.

Yes, Monty. Nuances matter. Like the fact that the guy teaching his dog to salute like a Nazi did so as a joke, and the punchline of the joke was to make this cute dog look like something completely horrible, and to claim that is offensive is to defend Nazis. Then there is the fact that the punchline of the tweet you are defending here is that blacks are not human beings.

Fucking amazing.

Shame you are not consistent enough to have said the same thing about Rosanne Barr when she compared a black woman to an ape.

Rosanne Barr said a particular black woman looked like a humanoid ape character in a film, which was a fact, not that this black woman was less than human.

Shame you have none of that nuance you keep talking about.

[Montegriffo]

You have far too much faith in courts to determine what is and isn't "grossly offensive", they don't protect fuck, it's a kangaroo court witch trial. Sad that you trust courts to determine what is and isn't free speech when they routinely show they don't have a god damn clue, what a dumbass.

I feel very sorry for you if you live in a country with a completely untrustworthy legal system.

Indeed, and your country also has an untrustworthy legal system when it comes to free speech. You guys are even worse, I feel sorry for you, especially when you hate free speech so much you trust them for no good reason.

I get it. You don't like restrictions on free speech. You have stated previously that ISIS should be free to post recruitment videos.
I disagree.

[clubgop]

Shame you are not consistent enough to have said the same thing about Rosanne Barr when she compared a black woman to an ape.

She looks like that ape chick from planet of the apes faggot. It's not a race thing, it's a separated at birth thing. Not everyone with african heritage looks like they are from the planet of the apes, but VJ certainly does.

So you accept Rosanne's explanation but not Danny Baker's.
There's a word for that...

Me accepting an explanation doesn't carry any legal consequences. There is a word for that and it is fascist, censorious faggoty fascism.

[StCapps]

I feel very sorry for you if you live in a country with a completely untrustworthy legal system.

Indeed, and your country also has an untrustworthy legal system when it comes to free speech. You guys are even worse, I feel sorry for you, especially when you hate free speech so much you trust them for no good reason.

I get it. You don't like restrictions on free speech. You have stated previously that ISIS should be free to post recruitment videos.
I disagree.

Your reasons for disagreeing are garbage, and yet you want to restrict something as important as free speech because of those garbage reasons, that's pretty sad. Of course the UK has no constitutionally protected free speech, because they have no constitution, like a bunch of fucking morons, so dumbasses like you can simply vote to make anything you find "offensive" to also be "illegal".