Teach Women Not to Rape

[C-Mag]

Uhhh, Carlus? That man is not 22. (Maybe 52) You don't need to make shit up to prove a point. People in power over non adults should never compromise that position. Never. Gender is irrelevant.

I don't know how old he is, he could have Progeria for all I know. Don't be so cruel to people that look old.


I openly admit I'm going to extremes to make my point. Let's just have equal justice in society. If we are tossing aside males for this shit and making sure everyone on the internet knows who they are I want equality for women too. These women deserve to be just as famous as Harvey Weinstein.


NOTE: somewhere in my search history with the NSA are now the searches for Mean Looking Football Coach, followed by Innocent looking 17 year old girl........................ I'm sure that's going over well when the Stassi get ahold of me

[SuburbanFarmer]

What's the allowable age gap for BroGrump ?

Any form of coercion makes it a crime, in my book.

If you want a strict age definition, I'd say any kid under 13 is out of bounds. Age gaps over 5 years are out, under 18. All subject to situation and context.

Hold On, isn't a teacher a person in power over a student............ Don't we in this society say that is inherently coercive ?

What if it's this High School 22 year old Football coach and this 17 year old girl

Regardless of your silly pic, society does assume coercion, regardless of whether it exists. I concede that it’s more plausible that a student could be coerced by a teacher, but not very likely. Prove coercion, and I join the witch hunt.

And no double standard from me. I have no problem with my legalistic stance, with the genders reversed, regardless of how I might feel as the parent of that girl.

[C-Mag]

Regardless of your silly pic, society does assume coercion, regardless of whether it exists. I concede that it’s more plausible that a student could be coerced by a teacher, but not very likely. Prove coercion, and I join the witch hunt.

And no double standard from me. I have no problem with my legalistic stance, with the genders reversed, regardless of how I might feel as the parent of that girl.

The US Government says that if you are in a position of power and you have a sexual relationship, your guilty. This gal having an extramarital affair with high school boys is going to lose her job and maybe do some prison time. I'd have to check numbers, but I believe women who legally rape boys get far lighter prison sentences and don't get the public attention from the media men do.

All I want is equality for Women.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Regardless of your silly pic, society does assume coercion, regardless of whether it exists. I concede that it’s more plausible that a student could be coerced by a teacher, but not very likely. Prove coercion, and I join the witch hunt.

And no double standard from me. I have no problem with my legalistic stance, with the genders reversed, regardless of how I might feel as the parent of that girl.

The US Government says that if you are in a position of power and you have a sexual relationship, your guilty. This gal having an extramarital affair with high school boys is going to lose her job and maybe do some prison time. I'd have to check numbers, but I believe women who legally rape boys get far lighter prison sentences and don't get the public attention from the media men do.

All I want is equality for Women.

I’m all for equal legal standards. I just have a different standard than the current legal one.

[Okeefenokee]

Regardless of your silly pic, society does assume coercion, regardless of whether it exists. I concede that it’s more plausible that a student could be coerced by a teacher, but not very likely. Prove coercion, and I join the witch hunt.

And no double standard from me. I have no problem with my legalistic stance, with the genders reversed, regardless of how I might feel as the parent of that girl.

The US Government says that if you are in a position of power and you have a sexual relationship, your guilty. This gal having an extramarital affair with high school boys is going to lose her job and maybe do some prison time. I'd have to check numbers, but I believe women who legally rape boys get far lighter prison sentences and don't get the public attention from the media men do.

All I want is equality for Women.

I’m all for equal legal standards. I just have a different standard than the current legal one.

One that differs based on sex. One might say a sexist one.

[SuburbanFarmer]

The US Government says that if you are in a position of power and you have a sexual relationship, your guilty. This gal having an extramarital affair with high school boys is going to lose her job and maybe do some prison time. I'd have to check numbers, but I believe women who legally rape boys get far lighter prison sentences and don't get the public attention from the media men do.

All I want is equality for Women.

I’m all for equal legal standards. I just have a different standard than the current legal one.

One that differs based on sex. One might say a sexist one.

Now I’m pretty confident that you can read. So I’m just curious why you seem to reverse my position almost every time you try to respond to it.

One could start to think it was intentional...

[K@th]

Now I’m pretty confident that you can read. So I’m just curious why you seem to reverse my position almost every time you try to respond to it.

One could start to think it was intentional...

There's really no point in reading what he writes anymore. His derangement levels are close to DSL's at this point. Any minute now, he'll surpass the master and go full blown crazy. Disappointing. He used to have valuable input. Now he just argues against straw men.

[Okeefenokee]

They've been squawking about the fucking Russians for a year, and they think they've got room to talk about derangement?

[K@th]

They've been squawking about the fucking Russians for a year, and they think they've got room to talk about derangement?

Point to a single post with me squawking about the fucking Russians and I'll concede the point. Otherwise STFU with your straw man. You have no actual idea about my beliefs, do you?

[SuburbanFarmer]

They've been squawking about the fucking Russians for a year, and they think they've got room to talk about derangement?

Point to a single post with me squawking about the fucking Russians and I'll concede the point. Otherwise STFU with your straw man. You have no actual idea about my beliefs, do you?

Go ahead and remind me as well, of that time that I squawked about Russians, other than when we launched 22 missiles at one of their allies. I'll wait here.

(Kath, he's onto us... we need to delete those hundreds of posts where we hate white people, and call for social justice. Quickly!)