Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Ahem . . .
once again,
Whatever we subsidize, we get more of.
What do you you all want to pay your money for?
once again,
Whatever we subsidize, we get more of.
What do you you all want to pay your money for?
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Parents who put their children first, but that's either free or all the money in the world can't buy it.Fife wrote:Ahem . . .
once again,
Whatever we subsidize, we get more of.
What do you you all want to pay your money for?
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
At least we agree the state can't buy it at any price.MilSpecs wrote:Parents who put their children first, but that's either free or all the money in the world can't buy it.Fife wrote:Ahem . . .
once again,
Whatever we subsidize, we get more of.
What do you you all want to pay your money for?
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
If a man wants the child and the woman doesn't shouldn't the man have the choice to get the child and the woman can give up all parental rights ?Kath wrote:He shouldn't be allowed to force an abortion, but in a perfect world, he should be allowed to relinquish any and all responsibility & rights wrt the child. The big problem with that is in many cases, this means the woman goes on welfare and the child becomes a problem for all of us.C-Mag wrote: I think it's only fair to give the guy some kind of say.
How do you reconcile that?
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
How can anyone? The state is supposed to care for children whose parents can't, but how do you teach someone to give a rat's ass about their kids? If I could pay for that, I would.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
MilSpecs wrote:How can anyone? The state is supposed to care for children whose parents can't, but how do you teach someone to give a rat's ass about their kids? If I could pay for that, I would.
In a small way, you have it backwards. What you want is free, and more importantly, the more you pay out, the less of it you get.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I don't think it makes a difference one way or the other. Parents who have kids for money or who don't want to care for their children - equally as bad. The state responds to the sickness as much as fosters it.Speaker to Animals wrote:MilSpecs wrote:How can anyone? The state is supposed to care for children whose parents can't, but how do you teach someone to give a rat's ass about their kids? If I could pay for that, I would.
In a small way, you have it backwards. What you want is free, and more importantly, the more you pay out, the less of it you get.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It makes all the difference. When you pay people money for something, you will get more of it. We currently pay women to destroy families and have children with multiple fathers. Then women like Kath blame men for the outcome.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Why does this conversation come up in every single DCF thread? I'm going to make a new term for it. Like Godwin's law or something....
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
Last edited by MilSpecs on Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.