Income Inequality

brewster
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by brewster » Fri May 05, 2017 12:01 pm

Martin Hash wrote:Sorry, unions are part of the problem; any clannish, extortionary behavior is.
Unions were great at creating job safety and a middle class quality of life for ordinary workers. Then they got full of themselves and out of control. Any time a union talks about protecting jobs not people beware, they've become a parasite rather than symbiote. And Public Employee Unions are basically organized crime. There can be no good faith bargaining when they're threatening to oust your city or state administration if they don't get what they want. So leaders give future goodies to kick the can down the road till it becomes a time bomb like we have now in a number of states. In my city they let cops rack up unused days off for decades till they get $500k when they retire and bankrupt the city.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18730
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Martin Hash » Fri May 05, 2017 12:06 pm

High Progressive taxation makes it unprofitable to squeeze every dime out of employees. We didn't start seeing EXTRAORDINARY executive pay until they got to keep most of it.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Fife » Fri May 05, 2017 12:08 pm

Baloney.

Whatever you subsidize, Unca Sugar, you get more of.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18730
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Martin Hash » Fri May 05, 2017 12:10 pm

You mean like the income of The 1%?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri May 05, 2017 12:50 pm

Executives make extraordinary amounts of money via preferred stock options. Progressive taxation does jackshit to limit it. You'd have to progressively tax capital gains, but even that could be skirted.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Fife » Fri May 05, 2017 12:57 pm

Martin Hash wrote:You mean like the income of The 1%?
The more you tax them, the richer they will get. Crazy, huh?

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18730
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Martin Hash » Fri May 05, 2017 1:10 pm

I actually find it amusing to debate tax experts.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri May 05, 2017 1:40 pm

I am not opposed to progressive taxation, but unless you progressively tax capital gains, your progressive income tax will hit the upper middle class and, at best, maybe the bottom tier of rich folks.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18730
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Martin Hash » Fri May 05, 2017 1:49 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:I am not opposed to progressive taxation, but unless you progressively tax capital gains, your progressive income tax will hit the upper middle class and, at best, maybe the bottom tier of rich folks.
Capital Gains are the prime example of how the many have been bamboozled by the few. The fact that anyone would accept someone saying they were magic & their money was magic could only come from a religious society. Capital Gains Rates have GOT TO GO!
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri May 05, 2017 1:58 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:I am not opposed to progressive taxation, but unless you progressively tax capital gains, your progressive income tax will hit the upper middle class and, at best, maybe the bottom tier of rich folks.
Capital Gains are the prime example of how the many have been bamboozled by the few. The fact that anyone would accept someone saying they were magic & their money was magic could only come from a religious society. Capital Gains Rates have GOT TO GO!
Capital gains is totally different from earned income. I agree that we should combine them into one tax, but you should argue that first and foremost. Just saying we need progressive taxation, when we already have that, doesn't mean much when progressive taxation implies only earned income in our common discourse. Start by pointing out that capital gains are taxed lower and that, to make things just, we need to put them under the same taxation framework.