-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Post
by C-Mag » Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:08 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:55 am
C-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:43 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 6:59 am
Only Carlus has so far admitted that these stories have been misrepresented in the American right wing media.
Hey you little Fuck.
I'm honest, don't fucking abuse that make you think you have something here using it in every fucking post.
I understand that you rarely have good arguments and it's tempting to use this one point over and over again.
Who is abusing anything? I'm pointing out that you have been honest and that others should follow your example and admit the American right wing press has reported lie after lie.
Look in the mirror Monte.
Honestly tell me your as happy as you portray about Tommy Robinson, and about Muslim grooming gangs in the UK.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:11 am
Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:51 am
Monty, you are a liar.
Your government covered up thousands of rapes for decades.
not the government, it was social workers, police and local councils
Your government arrested the parents who spoke out against them to keep it covered up.
prove it
Your government arrested the victims who spoke out against them to keep it covered up.
prove it
Your government banned your media from reporting on the rapes and the cover up.
not true, once the story broke it was widely reported and there have been multiple public enquiries
Your government arrested Robinson for violating their ban on reporting the rapes they covered up.
not true, Robinson was arrested for breach of the peace and charged with contempt of court which he pleaded guilty to
Your government banned your media from reporting on the arrest of Robinson for violating their ban on reporting the rapes they covered up.
not true, the judge banned reporting on the trial to ensure justice was not perverted and there was no ban on reporting previous cases of grooming gangs
Youtube restricted access to videos of the protests in your country to only those approved by your government.
not true, there were no restrictions on reporting the protests
You are a liar.
ironic
You cannot back up one single claim you have made there.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:20 am
C-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:08 am
Honestly tell me your as happy as you portray about Tommy Robinson, and about Muslim grooming gangs in the UK.
I'm not happy at all about grooming gangs in the UK. There is no continuing cover up of these cases though as is constantly being asserted here. Cover ups have also been carried out by the Catholic church in the cases of pedo preists and by the BBC in the case of Jimmy Saville. None of this makes me happy.
I am happy that Robinson is behind bars though as he is a violent thug with a long list of convictions including violence, fraud and travelling under a false identity. His reporting of the recent trial risked a mistrial at the cost of hundreds of thousands of pounds to the tax payer.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:41 am
People like Montez are the zombies. You cannot reach them. If they ever realize the truth at all, it will be when they are lined up against a wall and staring at the bricks before the bullet comes. If at all.
And before then they will veryhapilly come for you, just as they did for Tommy Robinson.
Lost cause is lost with them. Save the living.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:05 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:11 am
Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:51 am
Monty, you are a liar.
Your government covered up thousands of rapes for decades.
not the government, it was social workers, police and local councils
Your government arrested the parents who spoke out against them to keep it covered up.
prove it
Your government arrested the victims who spoke out against them to keep it covered up.
prove it
Your government banned your media from reporting on the rapes and the cover up.
not true, once the story broke it was widely reported and there have been multiple public enquiries
Your government arrested Robinson for violating their ban on reporting the rapes they covered up.
not true, Robinson was arrested for breach of the peace and charged with contempt of court which he pleaded guilty to
Your government banned your media from reporting on the arrest of Robinson for violating their ban on reporting the rapes they covered up.
not true, the judge banned reporting on the trial to ensure justice was not perverted and there was no ban on reporting previous cases of grooming gangs
Youtube restricted access to videos of the protests in your country to only those approved by your government.
not true, there were no restrictions on reporting the protests
You are a liar.
ironic
You cannot back up one single claim you have made there.
I already have, over and over again.
Just lie some more so everyone sees it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:16 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:41 am
People like Montez are the zombies. You cannot reach them. If they ever realize the truth at all, it will be when they are lined up against a wall and staring at the bricks before the bullet comes. If at all.
And before then they will veryhapilly come for you, just as they did for Tommy Robinson.
Lost cause is lost with them. Save the living.
This is how you know StA has nothing. He can't refute what I say so he starts name calling and prattling on about conspiracy theories and doubling down on lies about Robinson being targeted.
He can't even admit that Tommy was jailed for contempt of court.
Here's how the British right wing press report the case.
Robinson was jailed after he pleaded guilty to contempt of court and breaching the terms of a suspended sentence he was handed last May for a similar offence
Right-wing activists in America have also rushed to support Robinson, after restrictions ordered by a judge initially prevented his court case and jail term being reported.
A host of conspiracy theories in the US then began claiming that he was imprisoned as part of a plot to silence the right.
Robinson, 35, was jailed for 13 months on Friday May 25 for contempt of court after broadcasting on Facebook Live outside Leeds Crown Court — putting the major trial at risk of collapse.
The court heard how Robinson had filmed himself and people involved in the case, in footage that was watched around 250,000 times within hours of being posted.
Robinson, who was listed by his real name Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon on court documents, was sentenced to 13 months in jail on the same day as his arrest.
He was given 10 months in jail after pleading guilty to contempt of court, and an additional three months for beaching a previous suspended sentence.
Judge Geoffrey Marson QC told Robinson at the time: 'Everyone understands the right to freedom of speech but there are responsibilities and obligations.'
He added that if the jurors had seen his Facebook Live he would have been asked to end the trial.
A reporting restriction had initially prevented the media from reporting his conviction, but this was lifted at the same court four days later after an appeal by the media.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ondon.html
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:20 am
Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:05 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:11 am
Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:51 am
Monty, you are a liar.
Your government covered up thousands of rapes for decades.
not the government, it was social workers, police and local councils
Your government arrested the parents who spoke out against them to keep it covered up.
prove it
Your government arrested the victims who spoke out against them to keep it covered up.
prove it
Your government banned your media from reporting on the rapes and the cover up.
not true, once the story broke it was widely reported and there have been multiple public enquiries
Your government arrested Robinson for violating their ban on reporting the rapes they covered up.
not true, Robinson was arrested for breach of the peace and charged with contempt of court which he pleaded guilty to
Your government banned your media from reporting on the arrest of Robinson for violating their ban on reporting the rapes they covered up.
not true, the judge banned reporting on the trial to ensure justice was not perverted and there was no ban on reporting previous cases of grooming gangs
Youtube restricted access to videos of the protests in your country to only those approved by your government.
not true, there were no restrictions on reporting the protests
You are a liar.
ironic
You cannot back up one single claim you have made there.
I already have, over and over again.
Just lie some more so everyone sees it.
Same with Okie Donkey here. Just keeps repeating the distortions in the hope that if you repeat the lie often enough eventually people will believe it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:40 am
Monty is a liar.
Re: “The legalities in Leeds” and “Full story essential if you’re looking for the truth”, Have Your Say, May 31.
The stories by your writers are only half full. Reporting restrictions were initially imposed on the trial of a Muslim gang accused of multiple child rape. A second restriction order was imposed on the arrest of our heroic reporter/rightwing thug (delete as applicable) for breach of the peace. This second order was unprecedented, and was lifted after protests by both MPs and the media. One may ask why the child abuse trials of Rolf Harris and other 1960s entertainers were not subject to the same restrictions – a clear case of double standards. It is to the shame of your writers that they failed to mention the underlying issue, that of industrial-scale child abuse by Muslim rape gangs in UK. It took two decades before a professor and an MP finally blew the lid on this monstrous scandal, exposing official cover-ups by police and local authorities which continue to this day. We are talking about tens of thousands of young girls whose lives have been ruined. If it takes a rightwing thug to seek rough justice for children who have been let down abysmally by the system, that thug is my hero. And that is the full story.
Nigel Pike Phang Nga
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/ ... y/30346829
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:54 am
Monty is a liar,
The scale of the street grooming crisis in the UK almost defies belief. Hundreds of girls and young women were raped in the city of Rotherham, and hundreds by similar exploitation rings in Rochdale, Peterborough, Newcastle, Oxford, and Bristol. Now, up to a thousand girls are thought to have been drugged, raped, and beaten in Telford between the 1980s and the 2010s.
https://quillette.com/2018/03/14/britai ... ng-crisis/
When a local teenager was caught smashing up a glass chiller at the Balti House takeaway in Heywood in August 2008, police dismissed it as a simple act of vandalism.
The skinny 15-year-old girl was arrested and taken to the police station but then spent six hours pouring her heart out about precisely why she had acted in such an antisocial manner.
She was being raped. Not just once - but repeatedly - by a gang of men who would ply her with vodka and threaten her with violence unless she succumbed to horrific abuse.
She was being shared around paedophiles across the north of England.
And more than that, she was among a band of white girls who were being specifically targeted by a gang of largely Pakistani-heritage men because, as the trial judge would later acknowledge, the men’s victims were ‘not of your community or religion’.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk ... e-13043853
Monty defends this. Doesn't want it exposed. Wants anyone speaking about it imprisoned and murdered.
We have been over this and over this a million times and not once has he ever done anything but deny what happened, make excuses for the cover up, and justify the crack down on anyone speaking out about it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:55 am
One more nugget for those weeping for the children right now,
And then, in July 2009, an ‘experienced’ CPS lawyer ruled the victim was ‘not credible’ and decided that the two men who raped her should be released without charge.
Later, Rochdale sexual health worker Sara Rowbotham told an inquiry that all the girls had been ‘treated appallingly by protective services’.
“We were making referrals from 2004, very explicit referrals, referrals which absolutely highlighted for protective services that young people were incredibly vulnerable,” she said.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk ... e-13043853
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751