Coronavirus thread

[TheOneX]

What the fuck is wrong with these people

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/bost ... -rate-mice

hubris

[SilverEagle]

What the fuck is wrong with these people

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/bost ... -rate-mice

hubris

Bill Gates did say the next pandemic will be much more deadly. It won’t be this but something else they are working on, just to have perceived deniability. None of us here will buy it but the bazillion morons that live around us will buy it for sure. 2020 and 2021 proved that.

[SuburbanFarmer]

There’s a Facebook group called ‘died suddenly news’ with 150k members. They refer to the jabs as ‘cupcakes’, ‘hot tubs’, and other things to avoid the censors.

The amount of heartbreaking shit on there surprises even me. This thing is fucking deadly.

[SilverEagle]

There’s a Facebook group called ‘died suddenly news’ with 150k members. They refer to the jabs as ‘cupcakes’, ‘hot tubs’, and other things to avoid the censors.

The amount of heartbreaking shit on there surprises even me. This thing is fucking deadly.

The deaths are going to pick up rapidly in the next 5 years. Just a guess but I bet I’m not far off.

[The Conservative]

Going to go up faster with this bullshit. I've been in that lab before and did tech support for BU... this is on par with the Wuhan lab... we are fucked if this gets out... (my family doubly so)

https://www.theepochtimes.com/boston-un ... 03917.html

Boston University issued a statement Tuesday defending its research of a COVID-19 Omicron strain when they took the variant’s spike protein and attached it to the original COVID-19 strain, leading to a higher mortality rate in a certain species of mice, triggering concern among lawmakers.

“The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor-binding motif… while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80 percent,” the preprint study said.

One lawmaker, Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), said that the research entailed “lethal gain of function virus research” that creates the “potential to kill more people than any singular nuclear weapon.” Marshal, a doctor, added that “viruses have managed to escape even the most secure labs” and said such “research must stop immediately while the risks and benefits can be investigated.”

Meanwhile, Emily Erbelding, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’s division of microbiology and infectious diseases, told Stat News that the Boston University’s grant application didn’t specify that researchers wanted to perform this work and the group did not say it was performing experiments to possible enhance a COVID-19 variant. An investigation is now underway, she said.

Boston University issued a lengthy statement defending its research and said critics have misrepresented the goals of the study while refuting allegations that the study involved gain-of-function research, which can make a pathogen more deadly or transmissible.

“The research was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), which consists of scientists as well as local community members,” the statement from Boston University said. “The Boston Public Health Commission also approved the research. Furthermore, this research mirrors and reinforces the findings of other, similar research performed by other organizations, including the FDA. Ultimately, this research will provide a public benefit by leading to better, targeted therapeutic interventions to help fight against future pandemics.”

Certain reports about the study were “false and inaccurate,” Boston University official Ronald Corley said in a statement. A report from the Daily Mail, he alleged, took the “80 percent” line out of context.

“We want to address the false and inaccurate reporting about Boston University COVID-19 research, which appeared today in the Daily Mail,” said the statement. “First, this research is not gain-of-function research, meaning it did not amplify the Washington state SARS-CoV-2 virus strain or make it more dangerous. In fact, this research made the virus replicate less dangerous.”

Addressing concerns that the manipulated COVID-19 Omicron strain could escape Boston University’s laboratory, Corley said the school takes safety seriously.

“We take our safety and security of how we handle pathogens seriously, and the virus does not leave the laboratory in which it’s being studied,” he said. “Our whole goal is for the public’s health. And this study was part of that, finding what part of the virus is responsible for causing severe disease. If we can understand that, we can then develop the tools that we need to develop better therapeutics.”

However, one doctor interviewed by the Daily Mail expressed alarm over the research.

“The issue is what you’re going to be using [the labs] for. If they’re for diagnostic purposes, then you need them. But I don’t think every country needs a BSL-4,” Dr. Paul Hunter, an expert in infectious diseases at England’s University of East Anglia, said, referring to the top level of biosecurity used in laboratories.

“If they start having a dual purpose for research that has offensive military implications, that is the concern,” he said.

There has been widespread speculation that scientists at a laboratory in Wuhan, China, contributed to the initial outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan. Although Chinese Communist Party officials have officially blamed the emergence of the virus on a wet market in the Chinese city, some U.S. intelligence officials in 2021 said they believe COVID-19 either was created inside the lab or had escaped from the facility.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Ok wait.

they took the variant’s spike protein and attached it to the original COVID-19 strain, leading to a higher mortality rate in a certain species of mice, triggering concern among lawmakers.

We know that the ‘vaccines’ turn the body into a factory for spike protein. And this was done simply by mixing omicron with the spike.

Is this why the shots are killing so many people?

If so, that’s 80% mortality among jabbers. Approximately 3b dead.

[The Conservative]

Ok wait.

they took the variant’s spike protein and attached it to the original COVID-19 strain, leading to a higher mortality rate in a certain species of mice, triggering concern among lawmakers.

We know that the ‘vaccines’ turn the body into a factory for spike protein. And this was done simply by mixing omicron with the spike.

Is this why the shots are killing so many people?

If so, that’s 80% mortality among jabbers. Approximately 3b dead.

Could be, and it is why I chose a vaccine that doesn't do that.

[C-Mag]

1 of the 9 Midshipmen at Annapolis that resisted the jab.

[C-Mag]

Globohomo's attempting to strengthen their tyrannical control for the next time......
EU Sets Out Commitment to Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, Mask Mandates and “Legally Binding” Global Pandemic Treaty
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/10/22/eu- ... ic-treaty/

[C-Mag]

Katie Perry has Pfizer face
https://www.tiktok.com/@katyperrytv/vid ... 3413313798