Montegriffo wrote:C-Mag wrote:
#MeToo
He's posting pedo material in here.
Montegriffo wrote:C-Mag wrote:
#MeToo
See he confesses and I am not supposed to make jokes? Fuck that.Montegriffo wrote:C-Mag wrote:
#MeToo
Yeah thatll work, if you yell at them they'll be sure to protect your bitch ass next time. And I am sure your political party is going to shame the union funding their campaigns, sure. "The Cubs are fine they won last year.", idiot.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I want the police force reprimanded or shamed for failing to do their duty. If you want to turn America back into the Wild West, that's a different thread, idiot.clubgop wrote:You want government to do everything and save your Lilly white ass and when that doesn't happen you retreat with excuses like above. You don't want personal responsibility, you want a hero.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Fuck are you even talking about? Try to follow along, clown.
Well, ya know.. It's in their job description. "To protect and serve" is just what.. marketing?Speaker to Animals wrote:The assumption that others should have a duty to lay their lives down to protect your own life is mistaken. It's a foolish notion.
Yes, men who lay their lives down in sacrifice for the welfare of their countrymen are noble. That's heroic. But it's a mistake to plan our security around the idea that police will do this. It probably depends upon where you live, but I would NOT expect a Chicago cop, for example, to do a damned thing to protect me if it meant risking his own life.
Ultimately we are responsible for our own safety.
But C mag aint a cowardly hypocrite, you are. Suck it, bitch.GrumpyCatFace wrote:^^^This.C-Mag wrote:That's a problem I have with US Law enforcement and it all centers around this idea that LEO lives are more important than everyone elses. If there is any perceived threat to the LEO, they pretty much have the green light to shoot to kill. If there is an active shooter they will hold up and make a plan to secure LEO lives before they go in. I'm not too sure about what happened in Vegas yet, but the Pulse Night Club is a perfect example. We've given them all the gear to do CQB room clearing, but the LEOs aren't really doing it as far as I can see.Montegriffo wrote:
At least the Police here turn up promptly and kill the attacker within minutes. 6 mins from first 999 call to attackers dead in London bridge attack. Of course it's a lot easier when the police know the assailants only have knives.
So then you admit that you're derailing this thread, like so many others, with ad hominem bullshit. Well, thanks for shitting up the board once again, to spew your filth at me. You've really raised the bar for dip-shittery around here, and you should be proud of yourself. Now, just go ahead and drink that bleach, big fella. Your work here is done.clubgop wrote:But C mag aint a cowardly hypocrite, you are. Suck it, bitch.GrumpyCatFace wrote:^^^This.C-Mag wrote:
That's a problem I have with US Law enforcement and it all centers around this idea that LEO lives are more important than everyone elses. If there is any perceived threat to the LEO, they pretty much have the green light to shoot to kill. If there is an active shooter they will hold up and make a plan to secure LEO lives before they go in. I'm not too sure about what happened in Vegas yet, but the Pulse Night Club is a perfect example. We've given them all the gear to do CQB room clearing, but the LEOs aren't really doing it as far as I can see.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Well, ya know.. It's in their job description. "To protect and serve" is just what.. marketing?Speaker to Animals wrote:The assumption that others should have a duty to lay their lives down to protect your own life is mistaken. It's a foolish notion.
Yes, men who lay their lives down in sacrifice for the welfare of their countrymen are noble. That's heroic. But it's a mistake to plan our security around the idea that police will do this. It probably depends upon where you live, but I would NOT expect a Chicago cop, for example, to do a damned thing to protect me if it meant risking his own life.
Ultimately we are responsible for our own safety.
If we can't expect them to risk 10 to save 10,000, then I guess you're right. Let's all arm up, and shoot each other whenever a car backfires. Because that's 'safer'.
Soon as you admit that you are wide eyed kid throwing a hissy fit after finding out that Santa aint real.GrumpyCatFace wrote:So then you admit that you're derailing this thread, like so many others, with ad hominem bullshit. Well, thanks for shitting up the board once again, to spew your filth at me. You've really raised the bar for dip-shittery around here, and you should be proud of yourself. Now, just go ahead and drink that bleach, big fella. Your work here is done.clubgop wrote:But C mag aint a cowardly hypocrite, you are. Suck it, bitch.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
^^^This.
I admit it. Now go be an hero.clubgop wrote:Soon as you admit that you are wide eyed kid throwing a hissy fit after finding out that Santa aint real.GrumpyCatFace wrote:So then you admit that you're derailing this thread, like so many others, with ad hominem bullshit. Well, thanks for shitting up the board once again, to spew your filth at me. You've really raised the bar for dip-shittery around here, and you should be proud of yourself. Now, just go ahead and drink that bleach, big fella. Your work here is done.clubgop wrote:
But C mag aint a cowardly hypocrite, you are. Suck it, bitch.
This.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Well, ya know.. It's in their job description. "To protect and serve" is just what.. marketing?Speaker to Animals wrote:The assumption that others should have a duty to lay their lives down to protect your own life is mistaken. It's a foolish notion.
Yes, men who lay their lives down in sacrifice for the welfare of their countrymen are noble. That's heroic. But it's a mistake to plan our security around the idea that police will do this. It probably depends upon where you live, but I would NOT expect a Chicago cop, for example, to do a damned thing to protect me if it meant risking his own life.
Ultimately we are responsible for our own safety.
If we can't expect them to risk 10 to save 10,000, then I guess you're right. Let's all arm up, and shoot each other whenever a car backfires. Because that's 'safer'.
Marketing.
Their job is to exercise violence in service of the state.
The most fundamental basis of American government was that we ought to be our own police and soldiers. All able-bodied men were in the militia. If the sheriff needed deputies, he grabbed the men nearest him and deputized them. Government of and by the people means we should all be armed.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:No not marketing, I dont believe in marketing. It doesn't work. And everything government says is true, they would never lie to me.
They are my heroes, my everything.