We really don't see the effects of legislation til it hits us personally. We're fine with stripping away other's rights, but when it comes to us and ours we're suddenly gunshy. Perhaps all of these feel good laws wouldn't be passed if we put ourselves in the situation of the accused, or those that are most impacted by the law.clubgop wrote:Nope, you dont want that with terrorism, immigration, civil rights. There is no end to the fuckness. Welcome to Jedi's police and cradle to grave state.jediuser598 wrote:That's not my angle. When people argue against, say healthcare, they generally stick to the "other". When we argue the merits of healthcare safety net, we should argue as if it were our closest family member's life on the line.
If it's your family member on the line it's all infinite mercy on one side and infinite wrath on the other. What if your son or daughter was accused of murder, wouldn't you want them to get their full rights, or are you sticking them with a public defender?
If we treat our people in regards to healthcare the same way we treat our people in the criminal justice system, it's better to be rich and guilty than poor and innocent. If we run healthcare like that we're well and truly fucked. But people don't really see the truth of things til they personally have to go through it, or one of their family members do, it's like Dick Cheney and his gay daughter. Tends to change your point of view when it's you/yours on the line.
Do we spend a million dollars keeping granny alive for another month? Well probably not. Do we say to those who have pneumonia in their 20's, "Hey, sorry you can't afford the treatment, we've looked at your earning potential and your ability to finance this is just not there."