Net Neutrality
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
BREAK THE USURUS CHAINS OF CAPITALIST SWINE
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
“My local government gave Comcast an ISP monopoly and now Netflix doesn’t get to freely hog the lion’s share of bandwidth by Federal mandate! How are cities not burning?!?!”Smitty-48 wrote:I simply do not rally around the Democrat party base for a shriekfest, simply because the Republicans repealed a counterproductive regulation. That doesn't mean I am opposed to local loop unbundling to free you from Comcast, when the Democrats actually do that, let me know, but this regulatory virtue signalling to Obama's base which the GOP just repealed, had nothing to do with that.heydaralon wrote:
Well, you at least being honest about wanting more money. I don't think that will be good for the consumers, but whatever. Don't piss down my back and tell me its rain though. This aint gonna lead to a free market for ISPs. In fact, most people on this board would be fine with ending Net Neutrality if there was healthy competition and many different options for internet. The revocation is more of a bad thing.
Don’t you get what’s happened here Smitty? The locally mandated ISP monopoly doesn’t have to give content producing bandwidth hogs free subsidies! This effects all of us. Fuck, don’t they have Twitter in Canada?!?!
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
KYLO REN TELLS REY THAT HER PARENTS WERE JUNK TRADERS AND NOBODIES
WHEN REY GOES INTO THE CAVE SHE SEES HER OWN FACE INSTEAD OF HER PARENTS
WHEN REY GOES INTO THE CAVE SHE SEES HER OWN FACE INSTEAD OF HER PARENTS
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
So is the sum argument against my solution:
"holding my government accountable and fighting corruption is too hard"
?
"holding my government accountable and fighting corruption is too hard"
?
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Net Neutrality
Hence there's no reason to shriek about them being "literally Hitler" simply because they shot down Obama's phony baloney regulation. I'm not telling you to vote Republican, but in terms of this regulatory virtue signalling being repealed, it does nothing to adversely effect me, and it doesn't warrant the absurd sky is falling hysteria being whipped up as a partisan cudgel neither, so I'm just calling bullshit on bullshit, regardless of whether Blue Team or Red Team peddling it.heydaralon wrote:If there was a Republican initiative to end local monopolies, I would be on board with that. But they like their rivals across the aisle, are bought out. This shouldn't be a partisan thing. People who use the internet are getting fucked over. Unless Republicans are offline or something, this will adversely affect them too.Smitty-48 wrote:I simply do not rally around the Democrat party base for a shriekfest, simply because the Republicans repealed a counterproductive regulation. That doesn't mean I am opposed to local loop unbundling to free you from Comcast, when the Democrats actually do that, let me know, but this regulatory virtue signalling to Obama's base which the GOP just repealed, had nothing to do with that.heydaralon wrote:
Well, you at least being honest about wanting more money. I don't think that will be good for the consumers, but whatever. Don't piss down my back and tell me its rain though. This aint gonna lead to a free market for ISPs. In fact, most people on this board would be fine with ending Net Neutrality if there was healthy competition and many different options for internet. The revocation is more of a bad thing.
I call bullshit on Red Team bullshit all the time, I'm not on Red Team, they're a buncha cucks.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Fri Dec 15, 2017 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
nmoore63 wrote:So is the sum argument against my solution:
"holding my government accountable and fighting corruption is too hard"
?
How's that going for you so far? The Koch's are doing a good job, but we can't all contribute the way they do.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
Who is saying literally hitler? People can complain about shitty laws and bought out leaders without Goodwin's Law being invoked.Smitty-48 wrote:Hence there's no reason to shriek about them being "literally Hitler" simply because they shot down Obama's phony baloney regulation. I'm not telling you to vote Republican, but in terms of this regulatory virtue signalling being repealed, it does nothing to adversely effect me, and it doesn't warrant the absurd sky is falling hysteria being whipped up as a partisan cudgel neither, so I'm just calling bullshit on bullshit, regardless of whether Blue Team or Red Team peddling it.heydaralon wrote:If there was a Republican initiative to end local monopolies, I would be on board with that. But they like their rivals across the aisle, are bought out. This shouldn't be a partisan thing. People who use the internet are getting fucked over. Unless Republicans are offline or something, this will adversely affect them too.Smitty-48 wrote:
I simply do not rally around the Democrat party base for a shriekfest, simply because the Republicans repealed a counterproductive regulation. That doesn't mean I am opposed to local loop unbundling to free you from Comcast, when the Democrats actually do that, let me know, but this regulatory virtue signalling to Obama's base which the GOP just repealed, had nothing to do with that.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
They just don't have any good argument to defend this. Snark and nonsense is all they can muster. It's obvious at this point.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Net Neutrality
The Obama law was a shitty law, I'm not complaining about shitty laws being repealed, why are you?heydaralon wrote:Who is saying literally hitler? People can complain about shitty laws and bought out leaders without Goodwin's Law being invoked.Smitty-48 wrote:Hence there's no reason to shriek about them being "literally Hitler" simply because they shot down Obama's phony baloney regulation. I'm not telling you to vote Republican, but in terms of this regulatory virtue signalling being repealed, it does nothing to adversely effect me, and it doesn't warrant the absurd sky is falling hysteria being whipped up as a partisan cudgel neither, so I'm just calling bullshit on bullshit, regardless of whether Blue Team or Red Team peddling it.heydaralon wrote:
If there was a Republican initiative to end local monopolies, I would be on board with that. But they like their rivals across the aisle, are bought out. This shouldn't be a partisan thing. People who use the internet are getting fucked over. Unless Republicans are offline or something, this will adversely affect them too.
Nec Aspera Terrent