Trump Tower Bugged by BHO?

[C-Mag]

I dindu nuffin

Check mate atheists

There are a lot of relationships like that inside the Beltway, it's a snake pit.

I think the above post is a great question for Susan Rice when Congress gets her on the stand.

[TheReal_ND]

I leaked nothing to nobody
>I did not leak something to nobody
>I leaked something to somebody

Well pack it in boys. It's not making CNN

[TheReal_ND]

sometimes it was necessary to find out who that person was

WHAT IS THE LAW YOU STUPID CUNT?

[C-Mag]

I leaked nothing to nobody
>I did not leak something to nobody
>I leaked something to somebody

Well pack it in boys. It's not making CNN

Not even a mention........... WOW.

This is it. This is the one, Susan Rice is the key.

[Dand]

sometimes it was necessary to find out who that person was

WHAT IS THE LAW YOU STUPID CUNT?

RIP youtube video

[ssu]

No offense ssu, but you're derailing the spying thread with a more or less unrelated issue.

So let me get this straight: the actual FBI investigation, that from which Susan Rice is said to have wanted to unmask people, is a derailment of the issue? That the American IC surveying Russian intel officers get on tape that the Russians are speaking of one US citizen as a recruited agent, and that person happens to be later a Trump advisor (that Trump has for ages now tried to distance himself from)? Things like that? Oh, the outrage!

Hmm... where have I heard seen similar logic?

Ah! Now I remember:

In the democrat response to the allegations of the DNC favouring Hillary over Bernie and things that we learnt from the Podesta e-mails. Yes, I remember they wanted to talk about just about the hacking itself! Not what the hacked information told. Nope, what an outrage it was. And of course, hacking isn't nice. Yet how I remember, because of leaked (hacked) information, certain high level DNC person had to leave her office. And even if people deny it here, the MSM did mention the things like pay-and-play etc.

Look, I understand perfectly well that the dems naturally will try to milk this as much as they can, yet the idea that there was no Russian influence campaign, that it is hoax is simply delusional.

[Dand]

No offense ssu, but you're derailing the spying thread with a more or less unrelated issue.

So let me get this straight: the actual FBI investigation, that from which Susan Rice is said to have wanted to unmask people, is a derailment of the issue? That the American IC surveying Russian intel officers get on tape that the Russians are speaking of one US citizen as a recruited agent, and that person happens to be later a Trump advisor (that Trump has for ages now tried to distance himself from)? Things like that? Oh, the outrage!

Do you have proof for either of these statements? Nunes and the (allegedly) leaked info from Ezra is somehow sourced to the FBI now? There is no evidence that this comes from the FBI or that Russia referred to a Trump advisor as a recruited agent.

[TheReal_ND]

RIP youtube video

Wtf? It's not like they can take that shit down. Hannity is playing it over and over right now.

[Okeefenokee]

find it again.

[ssu]

Do you have proof for either of these statements? Nunes and the (allegedly) leaked info from Ezra is somehow sourced to the FBI now? There is no evidence that this comes from the FBI or that Russia referred to a Trump advisor as a recruited agent.

I assume we will for sure find out for as there is an FBI investigation and hearings both in the House and the Senate about this issue. The investigations will likely be extremely detailed.

So you will get an answer... assuming that you will believe in the Congress hearings, the FBI investigations or the US judicial system, if it comes to that.

Anyway, this is what I don't get: there's an FBI investigation going on. Why would some Obama then start doing something outside it? Why wouldn't they let the FBI handle the case itself? This is the Basic thing I don't get in the "Obama wiretap" and I assume that at first the Trump tweet was simply a distraction. Yet would the democrats want to use this against Trump? Hell yes! But why would they risk by doing something that is legal? Hence the wiretap idea is stupid. The unmasking argument is far more realistic, yet still doesn't change things. The idea that Russia didn't have anything to do with the elections is delusional.

(And what is forgotten is the real move that Obama did against the Russians. He warned the Russians to stay off the actual election process. And this the Russians did, they understood that there was the line that couldn't be crossed. Yet that isn't part of this drama, but in the big picture is important.)