Well, in terms of plot, I don't even need realistic, in fact, all the Iraqistan movies are too realistic, I mean, Apocalypse Now is Heart of Darkness, it's just set in "Vietnam", although really it's the Phillipines, but they did get the actual "Air Cav" from the Phillipine Army, so that's realistic, realistic in a technical sense, but then of course at the end of the movie a US Army Captain chops the head off a US Army Colonel, so, you know, not so realistic, but who cares? It's the greatest fuckin war movie ever...Okeefenokee wrote:Not to mention the only people who didn't roll their eyes at it for complete horseshit on realism were civies.Smitty-48 wrote:Hurt Locker was boring, didn't go anywhere, didn't have a plot, "wanh-wanh, I'm EOD, the end" Zzzzz.
I mean, it's art, it's not a docudrama, but everything now; is a docudrama, but it's all the same, and it's all boring
Go ahead and stretch the bounds of realistic, make it interesting, as long as it's done artfully, if you can pull it off, go for it, but enough with the MSNBC documelodramas, it's giving war movies a bad name, they're all like an episode of CNN reports, when everybody already saw the CNN reports on it, in real time, and the movie version is even more boring than the CNN reports, because of course it has to preachy and lecturing about it.