Month of Terror (or whatever you want to call it)

[The Conservative]

Can we call this an act of terror based off of religion?

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/02/sewer ... lean-body/

A Pakistani sewer worker died Thursday after doctors refused to treat him due to the fact he was “unclean.”

Irfan Masih, 30, went unconscious while cleaning a manhole in the city of Umerkot. He was taken to the hospital where he suffocated to death in front of doctors who refused to treat him because he was covered in sewer sludge.

[TheReal_ND]

What, they don't have garden hoses in Umerkot?

[The Conservative]

What, they don't have garden hoses in Umerkot?

Obviously they don't have clean water, if they did the sewers wouldn't need cleaning like they did...

[SuburbanFarmer]

Maybe. A better case of majority neanderthal DNA can be made for this woman:

Put some makeup on her, remove the photoshoop, and we'll see what she rates.

Is there some sort of million-year-old species purity thing you're going for? Just don't like women with a big mouth? (I think it's appealing, sometimes)

Big mouth, big teeth, long/broad nose.. neanderthal. Not appealing at all. These are features of pre-gracilization. There are reasons most of us will not find them attractive that relate to the same sexual selection pressures that domesticated most of our species. Think about the difference between a wolf and a dog. They are both the same species, but the dog is domesticated. Humans who are not domesticated have those kinds of features in addition to high aggression and other traits that make them less suitable for civilization.

I am not saying those particular individuals are not domesticated, only that they have features that remind us of a homo sapiens who is not domesticated.

https://books.google.com/books?id=ZMDMn ... on&f=false

Uh huh. And there's no chance that we just have a strain of human DNA that features a prominent lower jaw and brow?

There are very attractive women with those features. Billie Piper comes to mind.

[Speaker to Animals]

Put some makeup on her, remove the photoshoop, and we'll see what she rates.

Is there some sort of million-year-old species purity thing you're going for? Just don't like women with a big mouth? (I think it's appealing, sometimes)

Big mouth, big teeth, long/broad nose.. neanderthal. Not appealing at all. These are features of pre-gracilization. There are reasons most of us will not find them attractive that relate to the same sexual selection pressures that domesticated most of our species. Think about the difference between a wolf and a dog. They are both the same species, but the dog is domesticated. Humans who are not domesticated have those kinds of features in addition to high aggression and other traits that make them less suitable for civilization.

I am not saying those particular individuals are not domesticated, only that they have features that remind us of a homo sapiens who is not domesticated.

https://books.google.com/books?id=ZMDMn ... on&f=false

Uh huh. And there's no chance that we just have a strain of human DNA that features a prominent lower jaw and brow?

There are very attractive women with those features. Billie Piper comes to mind.

I already said that. I am not claiming these people are not grasilized. I am saying their features are enough of a reminder that they are not as attractive to most of us. Grasilization in humans occurred most likely as a result of sexual selection, dude. There's a reason for it.

Not gracilized:



You're welcome to it..


edit:

Those two chicks you posted are perfect examples of how those kinds of features can make a person less attractive.

[SuburbanFarmer]

I already said that. I am not claiming these people are not grasilized. I am saying their features are enough of a reminder that they are not as attractive to most of us. Grasilization in humans occurred most likely as a result of sexual selection, dude. There's a reason for it.

Not gracilized:

You're welcome to it..


edit:

Those two chicks you posted are perfect examples of how those kinds of features can make a person less attractive.

Same girl in both photos. Outfit and makeup go a long way toward determining what we find attractive.
I get your point, but I think you're drawing some pretty weird ethnic theory conclusions from different body types and backgrounds. Infinite variety is a good thing.

[Speaker to Animals]

Neither photo looks good, dude.

Nor is it ethnic. Almost all human groups simultaneously evolved towards gracilization on their own. Sexual selection seems to be the reason. The only two remaining groups who have not been domesticated are the Australian aborigines and some group in South America.

[C-Mag]

Maybe. A better case of majority neanderthal DNA can be made for this woman:

Oddly enough, there is a $ 1 Million Challenge to DNA test that woman, Ms. Clinton.
Not to check for Neanderthal DNA, but to look for the DNA of her real father.

[Ex-California]

Are Australian Aborigines actually modern Homo Sapiens?

[clubgop]

Neither photo looks good, dude.

Nor is it ethnic. Almost all human groups simultaneously evolved towards gracilization on their own. Sexual selection seems to be the reason. The only two remaining groups who have not been domesticated are the Australian aborigines and some group in South America.

The first photo is outfuckingstanding the second is Joker recast as a woman. Still would smash.