Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by The Conservative » Thu Jun 29, 2017 9:07 am

TheReal_ND wrote:HR bills 3003 + 3004 are today; the House will vote on immigration reform
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr3003
H.R. 3003: No Sanctuary for Criminals Act
  • Defunding federal grants from Sanctuary Cities/States/Districts and allowing citizens to sue those entities if they don't enforce federal immigration laws

    Cities in red states like Texas and Arizona will probably feel the pressure to change policies, Dem coastal strongholds like California and New York/Jersey will likely take the financial hit
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr3004

H.R. 3004: Kate’s Law
  • Imposes MUCH harsher minimum sentences on criminal illegal aliens who repeatedly ignore deportation orders and commit violent or dangerous crimes

    Tough penalties will create a massive deterrent to new arrivals
Voting begins at 1:30 PM and ends at 5:30 PM.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?430476-2/ ... e-business

Video will start at 12PM Eastern
Mass too, the legislative is voting to become a sanctuary state...
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
adwinistrator
Posts: 677
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Location: NY

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by adwinistrator » Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:26 am

TheReal_ND wrote:HR bills 3003 + 3004 are today; the House will vote on immigration reform
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr3003
H.R. 3003: No Sanctuary for Criminals Act
  • Defunding federal grants from Sanctuary Cities/States/Districts and allowing citizens to sue those entities if they don't enforce federal immigration laws

    Cities in red states like Texas and Arizona will probably feel the pressure to change policies, Dem coastal strongholds like California and New York/Jersey will likely take the financial hit
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr3004

H.R. 3004: Kate’s Law
  • Imposes MUCH harsher minimum sentences on criminal illegal aliens who repeatedly ignore deportation orders and commit violent or dangerous crimes

    Tough penalties will create a massive deterrent to new arrivals
Voting begins at 1:30 PM and ends at 5:30 PM.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?430476-2/ ... e-business

Video will start at 12PM Eastern
These are not congressional committee hearings, they are bills being voted on by the house, GTFO and make a thread about legislation.

:D

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:35 am

No, you.

User avatar
adwinistrator
Posts: 677
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Location: NY

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by adwinistrator » Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:46 am

TheReal_ND wrote:No, you.
Senate Committee on Rules & Administration
Business Meeting: Rules Organizational and General Faggotry
Jun 30 2017 10:00 AM
Russell Senate Office Building - Room 301

AGENDA

Committee Organization

Committee Action: Adopt proposed Rules of Procedure for the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration for the Martin Hash Forums.
  • Vote to distinguish 'TheReal_ND' as a derailing faggot.
Legislative Business
  • Vote on amendment to the omnibus resolution to include funding for NukeDog's own fucking thread.
  • Vote to favorably report omnibus resolution for committee funding as amended.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:51 am

This thread policing faggotry is silly.

User avatar
adwinistrator
Posts: 677
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Location: NY

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by adwinistrator » Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:04 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:This thread policing faggotry is silly.
Sometimes people get silly ;)

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:14 pm

I posted a cspan link so technically I'm in the right also someone find Steve King's statements

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:03 pm

KATES LAW PASSED THE HOUSE
REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED AGAINST HR 3003 : NO SANCTUARY FOR CRIMINALS ACT



Justin Amash from Michigan's 3rd congressional district

Image

Carlos Curbelo from Florida's 26th congressional district

Image

Mario Díaz-Balart from Florida's 25th congressional district

Image

Dan Donovan from New York's 11th congressional district

Image

Peter King from New York's 2nd congressional district

Image

Dave Reichert from Washington's 8th congressional district

Image

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen from Florida's 27th congressional district
Image

Source
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2017/roll342.xml

User avatar
adwinistrator
Posts: 677
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Location: NY

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by adwinistrator » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:12 am

Senate Judiciary Committee: Nominations
Christopher A. Wray
to be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation


User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Congressional Committee Hearings Discussion

Post by Fife » Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:25 pm

Fife wrote:Gowdy is asking questions he already knows the answer to. Here's where the fun begins.

The events of 19-20JAN2017 involving some as-yet unknown (to us) ambassador may well live in infamy.


http://circa.com/politics/barack-obamas ... -americans
Circa has reported that there was a three-fold increase in NSA data searches about Americans and a rise in the unmasking of U.S. person’s identities in intelligence reports after Obama loosened the privacy rules in 2011.

Officials like former National Security Adviser Susan Rice have argued their activities were legal under the so-called minimization rule changes Obama made, and that the intelligence agencies were strictly monitored to avoid abuses.

The intelligence court and the NSA’s own internal watchdog found that not to be true.

“Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of U.S.-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collections under Section 702,” the unsealed court ruling declared. “The Oct. 26, 2016 notice informed the court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had been previously disclosed to the Court.”

Speaking Wednesday on Fox News, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said there was an apparent effort under the Obama Administration to increase the number of unmaskings of Americans.

"If we determine this to be true, this is an enormous abuse of power," Paul said. “This will dwarf all other stories.”
Brennan fucking knows too. Check his body language like I said. "Hey dude, I wasn't even at the office that day! Hol up!"
Fife wrote:He knows, doctor. He has reasoned it out.


http://hotair.com/archives/2017/06/01/s ... e-reports/




http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07 ... panel.html

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/17/politics/ ... index.html