Oh come on Grumps, I'm supposed to accept a NASA list on why spending huge sums with NASA is worthwhile because NASA says so. You are not usually so gullible.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yeah no, you just walked into a bear trap, my friend.Montegriffo wrote:I agree that much more money is wasted on much more useless things but the brain drain of so many of the finest scientists is less excusable. I think the useful benefit to dollar ratio is overstated in advancements coming from manned exploration of the universe. It's too much of a vanity project in my estimation.ssu wrote: The standard argument for not having a space program is that "the money is better spent somewhere else". Just how better in truth the money is spent is one thing.
Yet as a space program is basically a huge R&D program which basically has to have a lot of Basic infrastructure and high-tech, that actually might be well spent than just to give the money for someones pensions and services that don't advance technology. Space is basically a quite demanding environment where things simply won't work if the parts of the machines are made badly.
https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2008/tech_benefits.html
I mean, without all those billions Black and Decker would never have come up with a new cordless drill.