StCapps wrote:Trump pay to play isn't a unique fault of Trump's either. Both sides had pay to play issues, at best that's a wash, not some big negative that makes Trump uniquely terrible compared to other politicians. When Trump's competition was just as bad or worse than him when it comes to his biggest faults, that isn't a uniquely bad politician.
Lol... okay
Hillary does it - LOCK HER UP!!!!
Trump does it - meh, so does everyone else.
If it looks, walks and acts like hypocrisy, well, you know the drill.
StCapps wrote:Trump pay to play isn't a unique fault of Trump's either. Both sides had pay to play issues, at best that's a wash, not some big negative that makes Trump uniquely terrible compared to other politicians. When Trump's competition was just as bad or worse than him when it comes to his biggest faults, that isn't a uniquely bad politician.
Lol... okay
Hillary does it - LOCK HER UP!!!!
Trump does it - meh, so does everyone else.
If it looks, walks and acts like hypocrisy, well, you know the drill.
Lock them both up. Still not seeing a uniquely terrible Trump. Hypocrisy is not the best anti-Trump angle of attack, that's for sure. All politicians are hypocrites when it suits their interests, yawnville. If a politician isn't exceptionally hypocritical compared to their competition, then I don't think it worth mentioning, it kind of goes without saying.
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
StCapps wrote:Trump pay to play isn't a unique fault of Trump's either. Both sides had pay to play issues, at best that's a wash, not some big negative that makes Trump uniquely terrible compared to other politicians. When Trump's competition was just as bad or worse than him when it comes to his biggest faults, that isn't a uniquely bad politician.
Lol... okay
Hillary does it - LOCK HER UP!!!!
Trump does it - meh, so does everyone else.
If it looks, walks and acts like hypocrisy, well, you know the drill.
Lock them both up. Still not seeing a uniquely terrible Trump. Hypocrisy is not the best anti-Trump angle of attack, that's for sure.
Is she locked up yet?
oh right.. first blatant failure of consistency...
oh right.. first blatant failure of consistency...
If you thought Trump was actually going to lock her up, then you were naive as fuck. That was obviously just Trump telling the people what they wanted to hear with no intention of ever delivering on it. I mean, come on, get real.
StCapps wrote:
Lock them both up. Still not seeing a uniquely terrible Trump. Hypocrisy is not the best anti-Trump angle of attack, that's for sure. All politicians are hypocrites when it suits their interests, yawnville. If a politician isn't exceptionally hypocritical compared to their competition, then I don't think it worth mentioning, it kind of goes without saying.
My point was the #neverhillary crowd's biggest complaint about her was her using her position for personal financial gains. That appears to be the bulk of what Trump is doing. Where's the outrage?
oh right.. first blatant failure of consistency...
If you thought Trump was actually going to lock her up, then you were naive as fuck. That was obviously just Trump telling the people what they wanted to hear with no intention of ever delivering on it. I mean, come on, get real.
Obviously.
Man, those rubes... actually voting on anything other than party affiliation. I mean, seriously... what fucking loons.
Kath wrote:My point was the #neverhillary crowd's biggest complaint about her was her using her position for personal financial gains. That appears to be the bulk of what Trump is doing. Where's the outrage?
Well for one the Clinton's pay to play scheme was far larger in scope and scale, but aside from that it's just regular old "if my side does it then it's good, it's only bad when your side does it" type logic from actual Trump nuthuggers. The media also seems to like Ivanka a hell of a lot more than Hillary, so that plays into it as well.
StCapps wrote: ]Well for one the Clinton's pay to play scheme was far larger in scope and scale, but aside from that it's just regular old "if my side does it then it's good, it's only bad when your side does it" type logic from actual Trump nuthuggers. The media also seems to like Ivanka a hell of a lot more than Hillary, so that plays into it as well.
It's pretty big already and we're not quite 100 days in. LOL. But, it's not Hillary; it's okay if the Trump family line's their pockets with some good ole' government gravy.
