Degenerate Faggots Starting Civil War2.0

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:11 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:It wasn't a joke at all. He was being humorous when he said it, but it wasn't a joke. And I am not talking about an edited anything. You can read the entire transcript for yourself.
Disagree. You could be right, but Milo says he was joking and I've heard the comments before and now, seems like a joke bro.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:12 pm

StCapps wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:It wasn't a joke at all. He was being humorous when he said it, but it wasn't a joke. And I am not talking about an edited anything. You can read the entire transcript for yourself.
Disagree. You could be right, but Milo says he was joking and I've heard the comments before and now, seems like a joke bro.

It wasn't a joke. Did you even read the transcript?

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:14 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:It wasn't a joke. Did you even read the transcript?
It was a joke. Did you even read the transcript? Did you hear the audio? Have you heard Milo make the comments in audio on multiple occasions to provide even greater context to what he's talking about?
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:15 pm

Milo: “This is a controversial point of view I accept. We get hung up on this kind of child abuse stuff to the point where we’re heavily policing even relationships between consenting adults, you know grad students and professors at universities.”

The men in the joint video interview then discuss Milo’s experience at age 14.

Another man says: “The whole consent thing for me. It’s not this black and white thing that people try to paint it. Are there some 13-year-olds out there capable of giving informed consent to have sex with an adult, probably…” The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”

Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age, I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relationships with older men…This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. (People speak over each other). This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most -”

It sounds like Catholic priest molestation to me, another man says, interrupting Milo.

Milo: “And you know what, I’m grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn’t give nearly such good head if it wasn’t for him.”

Other people talk. Oh my God, I can’t handle it, one man says. The next thing in line is going to be pedophilia…says another man.

Milo: “You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able (unclear and cut off by others)…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.”

Another man said, “You are advocating for cross generational relationships here, can be honest about that?”

Milo: “Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys they can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.”

If that's a joke, then what's the fucking punchline?

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:16 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:If that's a joke, then what's the fucking punchline?
I'm a Catholic so I think pedophilia is okay when the Church does it.
*drumline*

Like you've never heard someone make a joke along those lines. I get it, you don't like those kind of jokes, but don't assume he isn't joking because you don't like the joke. I didn't think it was funny either, any time he made the joke, I've heard people do better with similar material, but you don't see me jumping to wild conclusions because his joke fell flat.

I mean maybe you're right and he could have Stockholm Syndrome, maybe he actually really thinks that pedophilia was okay in certain cases, because if it happened to him he would have liked it, hooray Catholic Church. But a joke seems more likely at this point, IMO.
/shrugs
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:24 pm

Bullshit. We are talking about the rest of the quote. He has a long argument about why it is okay for homosexual men to have sex with boys in their early teens.
In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most
I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys they can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.
Those statements are not jokes.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:28 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:Bullshit. We are talking about the rest of the quote. He has a long argument about why it is okay for homosexual men to have sex with boys in their early teens.
Right and I'm telling you that is a joke as well. It makes an argument to provoke outrage, but that doesn't mean he actually believes all of that shit. I mean maybe he does actually believesit, but I think it's more likely this is just another example of his fucked up sense of humor. Milo says that what this is, and I'm inclined to believe him until I see proof to the contrary.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:29 pm

You are deliberately ignoring the quoted texts I provided that were clearly not jokes. You know you are in the wrong. You failed to respond to anything I posted. You intentionally deleted the quotes when you replied to my posts because you know you can't justify those statements.


This. is. a. trap.

Do. not. defend.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by StCapps » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:34 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:You are deliberately ignoring the quoted texts I provided that were clearly not jokes. You know you are in the wrong. You failed to respond to anything I posted. You intentionally deleted the quotes when you replied to my posts because you know you can't justify those statements.


This. is. a. trap.

Do. not. defend.
You are deliberately not making an argument other than it is not a joke and then quoting a source that doesn't prove anything one way or the other. I'll defend him until anyone offers any evidence or logical argument that it's more likely that he isn't joking, but you've yet to do that. If you do so, or someone else does so, then I'll condemn him for likely holding those wacko beliefs, but at this point I think you are jumping the gun because the jokes rub you the wrong way. Stop assuming that anyone who would read the quotes you provided would agree with your interpretation, this is simply not true.
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Okeefenokee » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:35 pm

I'm gonna take an apparently controversial stance against boy fucking.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751