TheReal_ND wrote:I feel like a competent lawyer could beat that wrap. Not that it looks like she'll be getting one lol
She already did a television interview and admitted to everything. She's fucked.
TheReal_ND wrote:I feel like a competent lawyer could beat that wrap. Not that it looks like she'll be getting one lol
It goes back to Magna Carta era common law. The general idea is: people agree to engage and do engage in some criminal act that is violent in its nature, and someone wrongfully dies as a direct result, then all conspirators are criminally responsible for the death; with intent regarding the death riding along.Okeefenokee wrote:Deaths occurring as the result of a crime are charged to any survivors of said crime.TheReal_ND wrote:That's the way it was described to me. I don't understand it though because her accomplices didn't commit a murder nor can it be shown they intended to that I'm aware of.
It's an old, OLD, rule. If you knowingly run with some gang doing gangster shit, then their stink sticks to you, just as if you pulled the trigger, even if you are crouched down in the corner, Marvin. It seems to be effective in slowing down gangster shit, at least among normies.TheReal_ND wrote:I don't understand how you get intent to commit homocide out of that automatically but I could see it argued that way. Still seems dumb but whatever. Not my case. I'm more worried about what happens if you send flashing gifs to Jews on twitter. Attempted homicide and hate crime?
Fife wrote:noscoping starts with you. and the Walmart.