The internet takeover thread

[TheReal_ND]

There is still voat.... I think

[Hwen Hoshino]

LATER FAGGOTS

I guess not that free after all

You are not free to commit murder. Same logic.

[Ph64]

LATER FAGGOTS

I guess not that free after all

You are not free to commit murder. Same logic.

So free speech is the same as murder now?

[Hwen Hoshino]

I guess not that free after all

You are not free to commit murder. Same logic.

So free speech is the same as murder now?

No but same logic applies. Living in a dictatorship can also be worse than death.

[DBTrek]

Wikipedia gets into the Alex Jones act:

Wikipedia Bans Breitbart and Alex Jones’ InfoWars as Factual Sources
https://sputniknews.com/amp/us/20181004 ... s-factual/

I didn’t know Prison Planet was considered a factual source previously, tbh.

[Speaker to Animals]

There must have been some conspiracy to inject prison planet news into the totally honest and truthful information provided by Wikipedia.

LMFAO

[C-Mag]

Wikipedia gets into the Alex Jones act:

Wikipedia Bans Breitbart and Alex Jones’ InfoWars as Factual Sources
https://sputniknews.com/amp/us/20181004 ... s-factual/

I didn’t know Prison Planet was considered a factual source previously, tbh.

True, but the real ruse is that places like the NY Times and Washington Post are factual.

[C-Mag]

Google Censorship Plans Leaked

THE GOOD CENSOR
https://www.scribd.com/document/3905216 ... from_embed

Google begins the presentation by saying early on that free speech has become “a social, economic, and political weapon.” They go on to ask “who should be responsible for censoring ‘unwanted’ conversation, anyway? Governments, users, Google?”...........

“The ‘little guys and girls’ can now be heard –– emerging talent, revolutionaries, whistleblowers and campaigners. But ‘everyone else’ can shout loudly too — including terrorists, racists, misogynists and oppressors,” Google notes. “And because ‘everything looks like the New York Times’ on the net, it’s harder to separate fact from fiction, legitimacy from illegitimacy, novelty from history, and positivity from destructivity.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/1 ... ee-speech/

[Hastur]

This is how their famous "algos" and "AI" that filters unwanted content works.

https://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/re ... -at-the-wo

[BjornP]

This is how their famous "algos" and "AI" that filters unwanted content works.

https://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/re ... -at-the-wo

Google got someone from a federal agency to talk to me, and that’s when it occurred to me that I needed therapy. She showed me photos of seemingly innocuous activities (kind of like a modified Rorschach test) and asked me for my first visceral reaction. I was like, “That’s fucked up!” It was just a father and a child.

Setting aside that I thought content moderator was something much, much more... mundane, I guess, this quoted part points to how (and why) these people might over-analyze, and see something said as much more sinister than it really is. Simply because of the volume of shit, depravity and violence they see, they'll also expect more of it.