He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by PartyOf5 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:50 am

Of all the crowd shots during the anthem I only saw 1 small group of fans linking arms. The other 99% had hands on hearts. Hopefully those images sink in to the NFL players, coaches, management and PR reps. We are your customers. You want to play SJW, do it outside of your workplace. The only reason any of you have such "privileged" positions is because of us.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:55 am

I don't care about linking arms. That's not disrespectful, really. It's poor form to use the anthem to make a protest statement in general, but at least it's not doing exactly what you are not supposed to do.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by DBTrek » Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:58 am

Okeefenokee wrote:That's enemy subversion. Communism will win means capitalism will fall. It means the west will fall. It means America will fall. You need to get your head right. Lt. Lenin is calling for the destruction of the nation, and you're getting your panties in a wad over booting his ass with prejudice.
Actuyally, you're the one hyperventilating like an over-emotional child and screaming about prison, which ain't gonna happen. You know what else "calls for the destruction of the nation"? Phrases like "The South Will Rise Again", or "My Only President Is Jefferson Davis". You think a cadet is going to prison for writing that in their hat? Of course not, because it doesn't trigger your childlike feelers.

Get a grip, stop freaking out, at your age you should have a little better emotional control of yourself.

I don't care if they chapter this creep out of the military, I'm just saying (as any rational adult can see) it's going to be a hard sell over voicing a political opinion while in uniform.

Derp.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by The Conservative » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:01 am

Fife wrote:Image
The fact they don't have an issue with them wearing pussy hats says it all.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by C-Mag » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:42 am

DBTrek wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:That's enemy subversion. Communism will win means capitalism will fall. It means the west will fall. It means America will fall. You need to get your head right. Lt. Lenin is calling for the destruction of the nation, and you're getting your panties in a wad over booting his ass with prejudice.
Actuyally, you're the one hyperventilating like an over-emotional child and screaming about prison, which ain't gonna happen. You know what else "calls for the destruction of the nation"? Phrases like "The South Will Rise Again", or "My Only President Is Jefferson Davis". You think a cadet is going to prison for writing that in their hat? Of course not, because it doesn't trigger your childlike feelers.

Get a grip, stop freaking out, at your age you should have a little better emotional control of yourself.

I don't care if they chapter this creep out of the military, I'm just saying (as any rational adult can see) it's going to be a hard sell over voicing a political opinion while in uniform.

Derp.
It's not going to be the statements alone that get him in deeper trouble, it's his associations. Have you checked out the Democrat Socialists Veterans site ? https://twitter.com/dsaveterans?lang=en
This is the headline image
Image

I see on there twitter some black Staff Sergeant posted a pic of himself on that website holding one fist up.

You may remember back in the 80s when the guys that really ran the US Army in Germany were Black, former Drill Sergeant, Masons who were Sr NCOs. Those guys starting in the 70s kind of became the Army within the Army in Europe. They ran smuggling rings and all kinds of crazy stuff. The Army eventually cleaned it up and broke up all those associations in the late 80s and early 90s.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by DBTrek » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:50 am

Sure, if the guy belongs to a subversive cell or is engaged in other illegal activity THEN maybe prison and a dishonorable discharge will be in order.

But it's not illegal to be communist in the US Army, so at this point the kid is only guilty of violating regulations. So why my fellow vets (who should know this) are talking about dishonorable discharge and prison at this stage of the investigation is a mystery.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
kybkh
Posts: 2826
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:33 am

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by kybkh » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:54 am

C-Mag wrote:
Nukedog wrote:Also, in this case, does anyone view a dishonorable discharge as being too heavy handed? I'm on the fence about it kind of tbh. I think he needs to be discharged but I feel like having a permanent black mark on his record like that may be a bit harsh. As far as I know, none of his subversive ideologies got anybody killed yet.
Dishonorable at a Minimum!
Article 88 Contempt
Article 100 Compelling Surrender to the Enemy
Article 104 Aiding the Enemy
Article 134 Threats

and many more...... throw the book at him, and get him a goddam barber

Leavenworth baby
If not for the offensive comments re: his commanders I would say a dishonorable discharge might be too heavy handed. The level of contempt he's shown and continues to show is clearly a dangerous behavior to be light-handed about. Being light handed on those girls very well may have made him think he could get away with the Che t-shirt bull shit.

A line must be drawn. I'd say the same if he was sporting a swastika and talking neo-nazi nonsense.
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by C-Mag » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:03 am

kybkh wrote:
C-Mag wrote:
Nukedog wrote:Also, in this case, does anyone view a dishonorable discharge as being too heavy handed? I'm on the fence about it kind of tbh. I think he needs to be discharged but I feel like having a permanent black mark on his record like that may be a bit harsh. As far as I know, none of his subversive ideologies got anybody killed yet.
Dishonorable at a Minimum!
Article 88 Contempt
Article 100 Compelling Surrender to the Enemy
Article 104 Aiding the Enemy
Article 134 Threats

and many more...... throw the book at him, and get him a goddam barber

Leavenworth baby
If not for the offensive comments re: his commanders I would say a dishonorable discharge might be too heavy handed. The level of contempt he's shown and continues to show is clearly a dangerous behavior to be light-handed about. Being light handed on those girls very well may have made him think he could get away with the Che t-shirt bull shit.

A line must be drawn. I'd say the same if he was sporting a swastika and talking neo-nazi nonsense.
+1
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by The Conservative » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:03 am

kybkh wrote:
C-Mag wrote:
Nukedog wrote:Also, in this case, does anyone view a dishonorable discharge as being too heavy handed? I'm on the fence about it kind of tbh. I think he needs to be discharged but I feel like having a permanent black mark on his record like that may be a bit harsh. As far as I know, none of his subversive ideologies got anybody killed yet.
Dishonorable at a Minimum!
Article 88 Contempt
Article 100 Compelling Surrender to the Enemy
Article 104 Aiding the Enemy
Article 134 Threats

and many more...... throw the book at him, and get him a goddam barber

Leavenworth baby
If not for the offensive comments re: his commanders I would say a dishonorable discharge might be too heavy handed. The level of contempt he's shown and continues to show is clearly a dangerous behavior to be light-handed about. Being light handed on those girls very well may have made him think he could get away with the Che t-shirt bull shit.

A line must be drawn. I'd say the same if he was sporting a swastika and talking neo-nazi nonsense.

So you mean the left?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: He Done Screwed The Pooch Now Boy-o's - NFL ed.

Post by C-Mag » Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:08 am

The NFL brand has taken quite a hit over this. NFL favorability ratings down 17% in 6 days.
Over half of Louisiana Voters want players fired or fined for protests.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/09/s ... -protests/
Over time, I’ve lost interest in professional sports for many of the same reasons I’ve lost interested in the professional music, film, and other entertainment industries.

They have become thoroughly politicized by the left as part of the culture war. So for me, the lastest public fight over NFL players protesting on the sidelines is just the latest straw, and in many ways, the last straw….

The result, for me, is a withdrawal from much of professional culture.

My last refuge was the NFL. Now that is gone.


NFL, I'm looking out for your best interests here. If you want the fans back, you need a lot more of this.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience