The Double Edged Sword of Term Limits

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: The Double Edged Sword of Term Limits

Post by The Conservative » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:50 pm

#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: The Double Edged Sword of Term Limits

Post by clubgop » Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:13 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:34 pm
clubgop wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:00 pm
The Conservative wrote:
Tue Dec 01, 2020 11:51 am


How? Please amuse me how SuperPACs are constitutional in the first place? And how stopping super donors from having more pull over our politicians than a normal person is unconstitutional?
Because a superpac isn't a PAC. There is no association, no coordination. Just a message to vote for or against. You are not donating to a politician, campaign, or party. Just messaging. You can donate your entire life savings to NPR if you want. Same to TYT. If you can donate to a media company endless amounts why not for a superpac?
Because said media company doesn’t (in theory) write laws, and isn’t elected as an official.
Neither does a super pac (in theory).

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: The Double Edged Sword of Term Limits

Post by Hastur » Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:15 am

All donations should be anonymous. There should be no way to trace who someone gave money to. Only that they gave to someone to enforce limits. Then people can claim they gave to someone but so could anyone. No way to prove who gave. No strings attached.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: The Double Edged Sword of Term Limits

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:20 am

Hastur wrote:
Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:15 am
All donations should be anonymous. There should be no way to trace who someone gave money to. Only that they gave to someone to enforce limits. Then people can claim they gave to someone but so could anyone. No way to prove who gave. No strings attached.
Now that’s an interesting, if unenforceable, idea.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: The Double Edged Sword of Term Limits

Post by The Conservative » Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:34 am

Hastur wrote:
Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:15 am
All donations should be anonymous. There should be no way to trace who someone gave money to. Only that they gave to someone to enforce limits. Then people can claim they gave to someone but so could anyone. No way to prove who gave. No strings attached.
You need identification of some sort. Otherwise why have limitations at all?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: The Double Edged Sword of Term Limits

Post by clubgop » Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:58 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:20 am
Hastur wrote:
Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:15 am
All donations should be anonymous. There should be no way to trace who someone gave money to. Only that they gave to someone to enforce limits. Then people can claim they gave to someone but so could anyone. No way to prove who gave. No strings attached.
Now that’s an interesting, if unenforceable, idea.
Agree.