Once and for all. Flipping of the Parties.

[C-Mag]

The big switch is a myth. The Democrats are still the racists, only now they manifest it by the Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations. The black man can't raise himself by his own power so we need to shower him in gibs and affirmative action.

+1

It's fucking hilarious. Right now, in the middle of the Democrats being outed for all wearing Blackface...……………. and they are pointing the finger at their opponents.

[TheReal_ND]

Maybe when Democrats decided sexual liberation is more important than workers rights a lot of people left.

You should listen to and read E Michael Jones. The left essentially gave up workers rights so go speak in exchange for sexual liberation. Ol bait and switch. Some of his most compelling arguments are about the culture destruction of the 1960s onwards and the machinations behind them of course.

I'm subscribed to Culture Wars on YouTube.

[GloryofGreece]

Maybe when Democrats decided sexual liberation is more important than workers rights a lot of people left.

You should listen to and read E Michael Jones. The left essentially gave up workers rights so go speak in exchange for sexual liberation. Ol bait and switch. Some of his most compelling arguments are about the culture destruction of the 1960s onwards and the machinations behind them of course.

I'm subscribed to Culture Wars on YouTube.

Did you know who the hell he was before listening to Myth of the 20th century podcast? Just wondering.

[TheReal_ND]

Yeah I heard of him but never listened to him before that

[brewster]

L
I guess you missed the part that at the time of the interview he's a Nixon strategist in his office a couple of doors down from Attorney General Mitchell. The guy literally wrote the book on the subject https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-revi ... -majority/

I guess you missed the part where one Republican out of tens of millions stating opinions that aren’t supported by historical data does not matter.

You don’t see abortion rights as a black and minority genocide scheme, I’m guessing - so pretending the ideas of one person encapsulate an entire movement is silly. Like, how dumb do you really have to be to believe that because One guy said it, it must be true, even though the data doesn’t support the conclusion?

“Sarah Huckabee Sanders says God wanted Trump, therefore in 2016 all Republicans believed Trump was appointed by God”

Derp.

Really dude, think for yourself. Don’t be so easily led.

Well, there's no where to go in this discussion. You poo-poo the primary source quoted at the time, you certainly dismiss any journalistic or historian commentary of the last 60 years, you only believe your ret-conning spin doctors determined to change the historical record. Very Stalinist.

As for "abortion rights as a black and minority genocide scheme", well, you might as well wear a t-shirt that says "paranoid crank". How about "anti-slavery was a scheme to get cheap labor with no housing, medical or food costs"? Once you start spinning, you can take it anywhere.

[Speaker to Animals]

Planned Parenthood was literally founded to exterminate blacks.

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

[DBTrek]

Well, there's no where to go in this discussion. You poo-poo the primary source quoted at the time, you certainly dismiss any journalistic or historian commentary of the last 60 years, you only believe your ret-conning spin doctors determined to change the historical record. Very Stalinist.

1. Your "primary source" is actually a secondary source (NYT article) - and regardless of what a single GOP strategist wrote, it didn't come to fruition. So why have you staked your entire worldview on a secondary source claiming a strategist predicted something that did not come to pass? How does that strike you as a wise approach to understanding history?

2. Let's briefly reveiw the four "ret-conning spin doctors" I cited to you (because I picked them just for you):
* Real Clear Politics
* The Hill
* NPR
* The Guardian

I'll grant you those leftist leaning rags are often Stalinist as fuck, which is precisely why I cited them to you. What, you don't believe anything NPR says now because they know the boondoggle you bought into is trash? Please tell me that's the case.

[brewster]

Planned Parenthood was literally founded to exterminate blacks.

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

Citation? You see, when you say crazy shit like that without backing it up, you just look crazy.

[Speaker to Animals]

Planned Parenthood was literally founded to exterminate blacks.

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

Citation? You see, when you say crazy shit like that without backing it up, you just look crazy.

Just quoted her own words.

[brewster]

Planned Parenthood was literally founded to exterminate blacks.

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

Citation? You see, when you say crazy shit like that without backing it up, you just look crazy.

Just quoted her own words.

Yes, so I see. Completely out of context and truncated words passed around for decades as slander. Figures.

http://time.com/4081760/margaret-sanger ... -eugenics/

Much of the controversy stems from a 1939 letter in which Sanger outlined her plan to reach out to black leaders — specifically ministers — to help dispel community suspicions about the family planning clinics she was opening in the South.

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members,” she wrote. It was, as the Washington Post called it, an “inartfully written” sentence, but one that, in context, describes the sort of preposterous allegations she feared — not her actual mission. The irony is that it has been used to propagate those very allegations. Cruz’s letter to the director of the National Portrait Gallery, for example, quotes only the first half of the sentence.