How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
There is nothing in the google news feed about the Senate Intelligence Committee director of security being arrested for leaking classified information to the press and lying about it to the DOJ.
Wow.
Wow.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
Could it be because it was a democrat sleeping with totes fair and unbiased reporters from the NYT and Buzzfeed. Will ooky condemn that? Nope.Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 6:02 pmThere is nothing in the google news feed about the Senate Intelligence Committee director of security being arrested for leaking classified information to the press and lying about it to the DOJ.
Wow.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
Waiting to hear about Cohen supposedly taking money from Russian oligarchs, in the past year.
Also waiting for his 'suicide' in the next few days..
Also waiting for his 'suicide' in the next few days..
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
How do you not see how fucking retarded saying shit like this makes you look?SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 8:29 pmWaiting to hear about Cohen supposedly taking money from Russian oligarchs, in the past year.
Also waiting for his 'suicide' in the next few days..
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
yeah, but... yeah, but... yeah, but...Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:09 pmHow do you not see how fucking retarded saying shit like this makes you look?SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 8:29 pmWaiting to hear about Cohen supposedly taking money from Russian oligarchs, in the past year.
Also waiting for his 'suicide' in the next few days..
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
Exactly.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:11 pmyeah, but... yeah, but... yeah, but...Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:09 pmHow do you not see how fucking retarded saying shit like this makes you look?SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 8:29 pmWaiting to hear about Cohen supposedly taking money from Russian oligarchs, in the past year.
Also waiting for his 'suicide' in the next few days..
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
Soooooo... your point is that we should just accept this behavior from now on? Presidents getting paid off by russian oligarchs?Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:16 pmExactly.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:11 pmyeah, but... yeah, but... yeah, but...Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:09 pm
How do you not see how fucking retarded saying shit like this makes you look?
As for the legality of it, they'd probably have a hard time showing direct profit from the Clinton Foundation. But the payoff in this case was allegedly deposited into the same account that was used to pay off Stormy Daniels. That gives the appearance that that money was directly used for the payoff, which makes it a traceable benefit to Trump personally, from a foreign government.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
The point is that no one believes you. No one believes you actually care about principles. You didn't care when the Clintons did it, you don't care now, and you won't care when the next democrat gets caught doing it again. You're just posturing and virtue signalling. Same old gas lighting horse shit.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:21 pmSoooooo... your point is that we should just accept this behavior from now on? Presidents getting paid off by russian oligarchs?
As for the legality of it, they'd probably have a hard time showing direct profit from the Clinton Foundation. But the payoff in this case was allegedly deposited into the same account that was used to pay off Stormy Daniels. That gives the appearance that that money was directly used for the payoff, which makes it a traceable benefit to Trump personally, from a foreign government.
No different than ooky coming in here pretending like she suddenly cares about communications protocols because someone sent some work emails through their personal accounts, after defending hillary for the same thing. It's nothing but no-integrity hacks too retarded to see that no one is buying it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious
I didn't vote for Hillary, specifically because of the corruption, and the email server. Whatever you want to call me is your own issue.Okeefenokee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:32 pmThe point is that no one believes you. No one believes you actually care about principles. You didn't care when the Clintons did it, you don't care now, and you won't care when the next democrat gets caught doing it again. You're just posturing and virtue signalling. Same old gas lighting horse shit.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:21 pmSoooooo... your point is that we should just accept this behavior from now on? Presidents getting paid off by russian oligarchs?
As for the legality of it, they'd probably have a hard time showing direct profit from the Clinton Foundation. But the payoff in this case was allegedly deposited into the same account that was used to pay off Stormy Daniels. That gives the appearance that that money was directly used for the payoff, which makes it a traceable benefit to Trump personally, from a foreign government.
No different than ooky coming in here pretending like she suddenly cares about communications protocols because someone sent some work emails through their personal accounts, after defending hillary for the same thing. It's nothing but no-integrity hacks too retarded to see that no one is buying it.
More than anything, your own hackery is exposed when you deflect everything by accusing others of it.