Drudge Obsession with Sex Robots

[C-Mag]

I don't think I could fuck a robot...…….. weird. Feminists should love them, they always complain about prostitution and demeaning women. It would fix most that, but they hate them.

[Ph64]

I don't think I could fuck a robot...…….. weird. Feminists should love them, they always complain about prostitution and demeaning women. It would fix most that, but they hate them.

If women couldn't use sex to control men anymore they'd lose their power. The only reason men defer to them is they know they aren't getting any if they dont, give them another outlet that can't hold out on them and...

You want what? A new car and diamonds?!? Screw that, buy them yourself.

[Speaker to Animals]

Imagine a world where men could have lifelike sex robots and just have their babies born from artificial wombs.

Women should worry about that. Because they'd then have to compete with men as equals and we all know most of them cannot.

[C-Mag]

It would certainly change the equation.

We should strive for traditional families, it's how humans turn out best. Women and Men really shouldn't be competing. We are designed to be complimentary, and work best as a partnership.

I think the best move we could make is get government completely out of marriage. Return it to a religious institution. Change marriage as we know it today as an official business arrangement, a business partnership recognized by the State, where both parties are equal.

[Ph64]

It would certainly change the equation.

We should strive for traditional families, it's how humans turn out best. Women and Men really shouldn't be competing. We are designed to be complimentary, and work best as a partnership.

I think the best move we could make is get government completely out of marriage. Return it to a religious institution. Change marriage as we know it today as an official business arrangement, a business partnership recognized by the State, where both parties are equal.

Good luck getting women to vote for that.

[Hastur]

Traditionally it has been in the interest of women to keep up the value of sex. Their power in the original tribe came from them being the ones who select which men are good enough to get a wife. That was the matriarchy. It worked well for a long time. That is why women hate sluts and prostitution. It cheapens their main commodity. Having sex was potentially very costly for women. It leads to children that has to be cared for and possible death in childbirth. Not so much for men. The fact that we have twice as many female ancestors as male ones show that it worked.

The big change came when we figured out how to regulate female fertility with the pill. The price of promiscuity was reduced considerably. It indirectly lead to a really scary STD epidemy a couple of decades later that could have wiped us out if we hadn't been lucky. We still haven't really figured out how to adjust our society to the new reality of controlled fertility.

Men being able to have as much sex as they want for almost no prize at all might not be a good idea. We really need to put some thought into fixing the whole male-female interaction thing again.

[Speaker to Animals]

Nothing positive can happen until women get a solid experience of suffering the consequences of their own decisions.

[C-Mag]

Traditionally it has been in the interest of women to keep up the value of sex. Their power in the original tribe came from them being the ones who select which men are good enough to get a wife. That was the matriarchy. It worked well for a long time. That is why women hate sluts and prostitution. It cheapens their main commodity. Having sex was potentially very costly for women. It leads to children that has to be cared for and possible death in childbirth. Not so much for men. The fact that we have twice as many female ancestors as male ones show that it worked.

The big change came when we figured out how to regulate female fertility with the pill. The price of promiscuity was reduced considerably. It indirectly lead to a really scary STD epidemy a couple of decades later that could have wiped us out if we hadn't been lucky. We still haven't really figured out how to adjust our society to the new reality of controlled fertility.

Men being able to have as much sex as they want for almost no prize at all might not be a good idea. We really need to put some thought into fixing the whole male-female interaction thing again.

+1 Great Post Hastur

It's funny that women still talk about this time of sexual freedom postitively, but women are generally angrier and seemingly less happy.

[clubgop]

It indirectly lead to a really scary STD epidemy a couple of decades later that could have wiped us out if we hadn't been lucky.

This part is overstated the AIDS epidemic never really hit for heterosexual populations. Syphilis in its day was way more dangerous long term.

[Speaker to Animals]

HIV is mainly something that only gets transmitted to another person by a male sex partner. So if everybody were heterosexual, it would be very unlikely to spread, especially in a nation like the US where a huge percentage of males are rocking the clean tip.

HIV infections are predominantly spread to men via taking it in the ass by an infected man's cock, and spread to women when that same dude who took it in the ass then has sex with a woman.