This is itSpeaker to Animals wrote:You could also just abolish all the unconstitutional income stealing in the family court system. There's that too.
Women have jobs now too. You don't need child support and alimony.
I am all for paying for day care along with education, though. No reason not to get a job.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I personally mean that dad signs a piece of paper stating he wants nothing to do with the child. Similar to giving up a kid for adoption, perhaps.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
If that's what you mean, who would take up the parental vacuum for the departing dad? A step-dad? Nobody? Who?Kath wrote:I personally mean that dad signs a piece of paper stating he wants nothing to do with the child. Similar to giving up a kid for adoption, perhaps.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It's a piece of paper with writing on it, but that's not important right now.Fife wrote:MilSpecs wrote:I clearly said written relinquishment. I'm not going to write the statute. You're the lawyer.
Yeah, you clearly said some undefined term. Not acceptable for honest debate. Say what you mean and say what you mean.
Define "relinquishment process."
Just say what you mean, clearly, and we'll be able to talk it out.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Oh holy fuck. How fucking disingenuous can you be?MilSpecs wrote:It's a piece of paper with writing on it, but that's not important right now.Fife wrote:MilSpecs wrote:I clearly said written relinquishment. I'm not going to write the statute. You're the lawyer.
Yeah, you clearly said some undefined term. Not acceptable for honest debate. Say what you mean and say what you mean.
Define "relinquishment process."
Just say what you mean, clearly, and we'll be able to talk it out.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
1) mother informs bio father that she's pregnantFife wrote:Oh holy fuck. How fucking disingenuous can you be?MilSpecs wrote:It's a piece of paper with writing on it, but that's not important right now.Fife wrote:
Yeah, you clearly said some undefined term. Not acceptable for honest debate. Say what you mean and say what you mean.
Define "relinquishment process."
Just say what you mean, clearly, and we'll be able to talk it out.
2) bio father has x number of days to file relinquishment with whatever state agency is so designated
3) bio father has x number of days to change his mind
4) I can be far more disingenuous
5) why am I writing a procedure for an SME on a Friday night
It would be the same procedure as adoption relinquishment but with a shorter time frame. Every state would have different requirements.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That's why I said:Fife wrote:If that's what you mean, who would take up the parental vacuum for the departing dad? A step-dad? Nobody? Who?Kath wrote:I personally mean that dad signs a piece of paper stating he wants nothing to do with the child. Similar to giving up a kid for adoption, perhaps.
The big problem with that is in many cases, this means the woman goes on welfare and the child becomes a problem for all of us.
How do you reconcile that?
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kath wrote:That's why I said:Fife wrote:If that's what you mean, who would take up the parental vacuum for the departing dad? A step-dad? Nobody? Who?Kath wrote:I personally mean that dad signs a piece of paper stating he wants nothing to do with the child. Similar to giving up a kid for adoption, perhaps.
The big problem with that is in many cases, this means the woman goes on welfare and the child becomes a problem for all of us.
How do you reconcile that?
Who's the adoptive parent if we let dad skate away free and clear, but if mom goes for adoption there has to be public or private caretaker in place?
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I'd like to take you to the child support docket sometime, just for shits and giggles.MilSpecs wrote:1) mother informs bio father that she's pregnantFife wrote:Oh holy fuck. How fucking disingenuous can you be?MilSpecs wrote:
It's a piece of paper with writing on it, but that's not important right now.
2) bio father has x number of days to file relinquishment with whatever state agency is so designated
3) bio father has x number of days to change his mind
4) I can be far more disingenuous
5) why am I writing a procedure for an SME on a Friday night
It would be the same procedure as adoption relinquishment but with a shorter time frame. Every state would have different requirements.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
We're talking about establishing a relinquishment process for prospective fathers, not current practice. I would think that you'd be in favor of this type of process. It would be much more fair to men.Fife wrote:I'd like to take you to the child support docket sometime, just for shits and giggles.MilSpecs wrote:1) mother informs bio father that she's pregnantFife wrote:
Oh holy fuck. How fucking disingenuous can you be?
2) bio father has x number of days to file relinquishment with whatever state agency is so designated
3) bio father has x number of days to change his mind
4) I can be far more disingenuous
5) why am I writing a procedure for an SME on a Friday night
It would be the same procedure as adoption relinquishment but with a shorter time frame. Every state would have different requirements.
I know you were talking to Kath, but why would there have to be an adoptive second parent? There isn't now. As she pointed out, how the cost would be borne is a concern and there will certainly be the problem of fathers relinquishing on paper only, but like current welfare practices it would be a relatively small segment of the population.