Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Yes
22
63%
No
13
37%
 
Total votes: 35
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:18 pm

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:18 pm

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by TheReal_ND » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:21 pm

Cat gentrification. We need to cultural enrich his living space.
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:21 pm

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by TheReal_ND » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:22 pm

Image

Good things will come to you but only if you post "good doggo" in this thread.
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:28 pm

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Okeefenokee » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:28 pm

Image
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:29 pm

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by TheReal_ND » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:30 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:Image
POO IN LOO
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:30 pm

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top

Return to “Current Events”