Unite the Right

[Speaker to Animals]

What people like Milspecs mean by "national unity" and whatnot is a codeword for your capitulation and acceptance of the eradication of your culture.

[Smitty-48]

I think it's more like two liberal chicks are trying to invoke an America that never was, the one where all Americans were united in defense of angry black commies, when in fact, there are really only two things Americans have ever really been united against, and that is in fact angry blacks, and commies. I mean, who you trying to kid?

I said BLM was composed of Americans, not some kind of outside force, and that their sentiments were longstanding albeit under different names over our history.

The American Communist party was composed of Americans too, but like BLM, their ideology was an anathema to American liberty.

We are mostly united over terrorism. We may fight over the definition, but we were one angry people after 9/11.

You were united for a brief moment after 9/11, but as soon as the Bush administration started to respond with military forces, the liberals broke ranks and became openly seditious against the war on terror.

It's funny, Smitty, I think of you sharing the same unspoken mores and taboos and common historical feelings that we have, and of course you don't.

I'm a rugged individualist, and I'm not big on subjective mores and taboos, I find them to be mostly fallacious, and generally repressive.

My grandparents (meaning most people here's great grandparents) held strong feelings of Americans first and regionalism second. World War II taught them that and they passed it down. If I had ever said to my grandmother that I thought we should get rid of the south because we have nothing in common with them and they have nothing to offer us she would have slapped me for disrespecting the country, and deservedly so. So, liberal maybe but old school more.

My grandparents were Americans, from Glendale California, they didn't have much time for the Southrons and their Lost Cause, but they would have sided with them in a heartbeat, in the face of angry black commies, angry blacks and/or commies, that was not to be tolerated under any circumstances.

[MilSpecs]

If someone was really an American first, they would have hung these seditious Antifa types by now, what kind of American tolerates a mob of Bolsheviks? Never used to, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg went to the chair for less than what these Bolshies get up to now.

We've always united as one country and put regionalism aside when push came to shove. Ideological deviancy is not a shove.

We formed two countries in the 1860s, when push went to war. How is that not dividing along regional lines?

Yes, because there would be slavery in America or there would not. The 'would not' won. Should we have seeded every acre with salt? We reunited and over time we've mixed together more than ever before. Now another contraction is happening but its not along strict regional lines anymore. It's different than last time in that way.

[Smitty-48]

Yes, because there would be slavery in America or there would not. The 'would not' won.

Not really tho, the realpolitik was; which American aristocracy would control the exploitation of the continent, the planting aristocracy in Dixie, or the banking aristocracy in Manhattan. The banking aristocracy won.

[MilSpecs]

What people like Milspecs mean by "national unity" and whatnot is a codeword for your capitulation and acceptance of the eradication of your culture.

Your culture is a subset of American culture. If it is not then that would mean you are not an American.

[Okeefenokee]

It's not an either/or problem.
It's not either condemn alt-right vehicular homicide or condemn antifa/leftist firearm homicides.
There's a cool, rational, middle ground called condemn homicides.

If we could all reach that place, THEN we could dig into the nuances of why these groups of idiots are converging in one location to bash each other's brains out. But when homicides can't even be roundly condemned it's awfully lofty to try to start a conversation of "Well, why is this happening and who is at fault"?

If you can't get folks to agree that murdering each other is wrong good luck bringing them to a consensus on the underlying causes of the conflict.

It's clear you've been watching an alternate timeline.

[Okeefenokee]

Here's the problem with DB's tactic: it only goes one way. They instigate riots and attack people and then pretend like it wasn't them. Some guy freaks out after THEY attacked his vehicle with deadly weapons and runs some fat antifa chick over, suddenly it's time for everybody to condemn all violence because look how horrible everybody is on the right.

Yet where was that sentiment every time their BLM pets started race riots and brutally beat white people simply for being white? Where was that sentiment every time the militant wing of the democratic party (Antifa) marched into a crowd of people and started attacking them? Yeah.. crickets.

It's reached the point where I won't shed a tear for these people. They started the violence. They ended up with the most casualties. Fuck them. Sure, arrest everybody you can, but hey, wait a minutes, the cops aren't arresting their little Antifa buddies.. How very interesting..

Don't expect me to shed a tear for these colonizing, cultural genociding little rioters. They wanted to roll into a lawful assembly armed with deadly weapons to attack people and got plowed by a Freedom Car. LOL.

Fuck you for trying to guilt me into caring about these degenerate yoyos.

+1

It's time to break up.

[Smitty-48]

Your culture is a subset of American culture. If it is not then that would mean you are not an American.

Theoretically, each individual state has its own culture, and the sum of all those cultures is the American culture, to wit, is the culture in New York the same as the culture in South Carolina? Never was.

The conflict now, is really that there is a postmodern global monoculture, which for the most part urban America has completely embraced, but which outside of urban America, there are still pockets of Americans trying to cling to their distinctive culture and heritage in the face of imposed internationalism. I mean, duh.

[MilSpecs]

Your culture is a subset of American culture. If it is not then that would mean you are not an American.

Theoretically, each individual state has its own culture, and the sum of all those cultures is the American culture, to wit, is the culture in New York the same as the culture in South Carolina? Never was.

The conflict now, is really that there is a postmodern global monoculture, which for the most part urban America has completely embraced, but which outside of urban America, there are still pockets of Americans trying to cling to their distinctive culture and heritage in the face of imposed internationalism. I mean, duh.

Disagree. All we have to do to recognize our common culture is to travel outside the country together. Many of us also move back and forth easily between cultures as well.

[Okeefenokee]

Woah hey now. Gamergate has nothing to do with these alt-right shit heads. Gamergate was about protecting the gamer identity when a bunch of games journalism sites tried to say "gamers are dead." Then some cry bullies started making bucko bucks off of being cry bullies. Gamergate was anti-sjw but they're also anti alt-right. Want a throrough history I can give you one on it. Gamergate is largely leftists who are anti-sjw.

If you think that, then you seriously don't know what gamer gate was about.

I've visited and or posted on kotaku in action nearly every day since it started in 2014. I know more about the movement than anyone here.

Someone post the fag gif.