THE ERA OF TRUMP

[doc_loliday]

The Washington Post contacted all 26 members of the 2016 Senate Armed Services Committee to see whether any lawmakers besides Sessions met with Kislyak in 2016. Of the 20 lawmakers who responded, every senator, including Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.), said they did not meet with the Russian ambassador last year. The other lawmakers on the panel did not respond as of Wednesday evening

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... e7df906a9d

They should all be investigated! Their business is my business!

Why would we investigate those that didn't have meetings with the Russians? Don't you see the difference?

[Dand]

I didn't say he was a KGB agent. He was asked if he had contact, he said "No." and this isn't true.

"About the 2016 election"

[doc_loliday]

I think he was lying, so you have my bias up front. But he met with them, which apparently is something the other committee members never do, and I guess he doesn't recall what was discussed. Even if the CNN allegations are false, the timing alone justifies the scrutiny of Sessions. Demanding that our Congressmen demonstrate that they are beyond suspicion is also justified.

[de officiis]

I didn't say he was a KGB agent. He was asked if he had contact, he said "No." and this isn't true.

"About the 2016 election"

Context: noun: discourse that surrounds a language unit and helps to determine its interpretation.

[Alexander PhiAlipson]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... e7df906a9d

They should all be investigated! Their business is my business!

Why would we investigate those that didn't have meetings with the Russians? Don't you see the difference?

Wait a second--they only said they didn't, and only to WaPo--do you see the difference?

[apeman]

"I've been on the Armed Services Com for 10 years. No call or meeting w/Russian ambassador. Ever. Ambassadors call members of Foreign Rel Com," she said in a Twitter post on Thursday.

http://www.businessinsider.com/democrat ... cts-2017-3

Well, it has been remarked that he doesn't have a strong recollection of what was said in those meetings prior to the election.

Twitter is circulating a Claire McCaskill tweet from 2013 : "off to a meeting with Russian ambassador..."

and

2015: "today calls with British, Russain and German Ambassadors . . . "

[doc_loliday]

They should all be investigated! Their business is my business!

Why would we investigate those that didn't have meetings with the Russians? Don't you see the difference?

Wait a second--they only said they didn't, and only to WaPo--do you see the difference?

I have zero problem with the veracity of their statements being determined. I expect them to lie just as much as say, Sessions. Let me ask you, do you find Session's story to be suspicious? Even if you don't, do you think it reasonable that we try to find out if he is telling the truth or not, to find out what may have happened?

[K@th]

Twitter is circulating a Claire McCaskill tweet from 2013 : "off to a meeting with Russian ambassador..."

and

2015: "today calls with British, Russain and German Ambassadors . . . "

That is really, really bad. Shame on her. We can't believe a word these fuckers say, with or without taking an oath.

[doc_loliday]

Color me shocked. Nobody should be giving them the benefit of the doubt.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Twitter is circulating a Claire McCaskill tweet from 2013 : "off to a meeting with Russian ambassador..."

and

2015: "today calls with British, Russain and German Ambassadors . . . "

That is really, really bad. Shame on her. We can't believe a word these fuckers say, with or without taking an oath.

Man, we should really elect someone to drain that swamp...