I think it can be better. Meaning that not everything is lost. Not as much as some idealist social engineer would want, but still. The way I see it, believing in some ideological answer is the road to hell in this matter. Perhaps the only ideology is that human life should be cherised... and all the thing constitutions etc. blabber about. Yet a totally ideological approach will bring misery as it will utterly fail.Martin Hash wrote:My personal experience with The Poor has left me unhopeful. Perhaps yours has been better?
Eradicating absolute povetry through welfar has the following (from my own experience):
1) Those who genuinely want to become criminals are typically the criminals (and drug addicts, who have an expensive lifestyle). Nobody is forced into crime... but crime naturally persists.
2) One has to import beggars from other countries, if one has to have beggars in the streets.
3) Apathy and alienation from the society persists, and can increase in a welfare state. Povetry isn't a simple thing.
Anyway, the society is a far more complex thing that people admit it to be.