The internet takeover thread

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:25 pm

Facebook and to a much lesser extent Twitter are sort of monopolies only because of the network effect. Google is a monopoly because they have patents that make their search results enormously more accurate and complete than any competitor. Google's monopoly is entirely state-created in that respect and can be rescinded the same way.

Fixing Facebook and Twitter I think (for now) requires nothing more than forbidding political discrimination on social networks that are marketed as for everybody. If Facebook wants to limit itself to only progressives and communists, then cool, they should explicitly state that and allow somebody else to make something to pick up all the non-communists who leave/get booted from Facebook.


But more importantly, I think the idea that we need huge centralized social networks is fucking archaic already. We need an open architecture on how we create social network profiles and posts. Then people can join any number of small networks that cater to their specific needs. Those networks all integrate and connect to one another.

Facebook is AOL.

Google, though, they just need real competition. There's no network effect. You can use any search engine you fucking want. You use Google because it works best. I use DuckDuckGo because fuck Google, but I am often looking for something specific and DuckDuckGo is a piece of shit so I just go to Google to find it. Also, if I am looking for images and memes, I have to use Google sometimes because I don't feel like scrolling through endless pages of dick and pussy just to find a meme about frogs.

heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by heydaralon » Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:31 pm

I think it would make more sense to make conservative users pay for their accounts on social media sites. The reason being, their comments take up more bandwith as space because liberals have to waste time explaining to them why progressive wealth redistribution is essential or why affirmative action quotas are the only way to make sure a business runs properly. Liberal users already understand these facts, so there is less didactic positive crowd retweeting and responding than there would be if the person was a misguided MAGA type, thus less wear and tear on the servers. I think making conservative pay for their accounts and posts would also drive many of them off social media, and create a more honest and moral online atmosphere that is identical to objective reality.
Shikata ga nai

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Sep 16, 2018 9:51 am

Alphabet (Google) will just spun off their cloud services and fiber from the search engine, and call it a day.

The company is honestly way too big as is.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18721
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Martin Hash » Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:13 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:25 pm
Google is a monopoly because they have patents that make their search results enormously more accurate and complete than any competitor. Google's monopoly is entirely state-created in that respect and can be rescinded the same way.
Patents expire 20 years after the filing date, or January 9, 2018 for this patent. Shortly thereafter, all the search engines will probably deploy some kind of PageRank algorithm.
The Venture Capital backers were way more important than the patent ever was.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Hastur » Tue Sep 18, 2018 12:57 pm

Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:00 pm

Alternative Influence Network: i.e. rational people who do not enjoy propaganda.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by TheReal_ND » Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:00 pm

Lol like it's just a map nigga. Move around and shit

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Hastur » Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:01 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:00 pm
Alternative Influence Network: i.e. rational people who do not enjoy propaganda.
Meant like a purge list.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:05 pm

Hastur wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:01 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:00 pm
Alternative Influence Network: i.e. rational people who do not enjoy propaganda.
Meant like a purge list.
Of course they are going to purge us from the Internet. Duh.

But net neutrality sucks, so bye, I guess.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by TheReal_ND » Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:12 pm

.name registrar is still hosting Anglin lol. Plenty of room left for domains.