You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.Montegriffo wrote:
Nuff said
Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Moderate not censor.StCapps wrote:You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.Montegriffo wrote:
Nuff said
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.Montegriffo wrote:Moderate not censor.StCapps wrote:You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.Montegriffo wrote:
Nuff said
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
At least I'm not anti-semantic.StCapps wrote:It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.Montegriffo wrote:Moderate not censor.StCapps wrote:You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Not bad, lulz. You should try that approach with clubby, just make jokes, no more calls for censorship. That might help you begin to reduce the perception of your cowardice.Montegriffo wrote:At least I'm not anti-semantic.StCapps wrote:It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.Montegriffo wrote: Moderate not censor.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Do you are saying that Capps is going Pete Townshend on Martin's equipment while I am Ted Nugent playing Stanglehold on a loop with Martin's equipment and Monty is Tiny Tim. Tiny Tim doesn't hurt the equipment but no one likes Tiny Tim.de officiis wrote:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_v. ... nst_Racism
Cool.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
No that is apparently Bjorn departments.Montegriffo wrote:At least I'm not anti-semantic.StCapps wrote:It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.Montegriffo wrote: Moderate not censor.