Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Yes
22
63%
No
13
37%
 
Total votes: 35

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:34 pm

Montegriffo wrote:Image

Nuff said
You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:40 pm

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:41 pm

StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:Image

Nuff said
You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.
Moderate not censor.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:44 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:Image

Nuff said
You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.
Moderate not censor.
It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:48 pm

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:52 pm

StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:You should start a poll on which act is more cowardly, tattling to the moderator to censor clubgop or clubgop turning down your loser leaves the forum challenge. I'm guessing the results won't please you, prove me wrong.
Moderate not censor.
It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.
At least I'm not anti-semantic.
Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:54 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote: Moderate not censor.
It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.
At least I'm not anti-semantic.
Image
Not bad, lulz. You should try that approach with clubby, just make jokes, no more calls for censorship. That might help you begin to reduce the perception of your cowardice.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:59 pm

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by clubgop » Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:04 pm

Do you are saying that Capps is going Pete Townshend on Martin's equipment while I am Ted Nugent playing Stanglehold on a loop with Martin's equipment and Monty is Tiny Tim. Tiny Tim doesn't hurt the equipment but no one likes Tiny Tim.

Cool.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

Post by clubgop » Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:05 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Montegriffo wrote: Moderate not censor.
It's not either/or, it's both. You and BjornP really are overly semantic blockheads, and you aren't even right about the semantics.
At least I'm not anti-semantic.
Image
No that is apparently Bjorn departments.