Our Guy Flynn

[heydaralon]

The turks are very fond of sodomizing westerners. They did it to Lawrence of Arabia. They tried doing it to that white guy at the end of Midnight Express, and they did it to Flynn. Sunrise, sunset.

It was implied, but not shown, that the guy in midnight express was sodomized by the warden from the very start. That scene at the end was when he finally got back at him.

Its been awhile since I've seen that movie, it may be time for a rewatch. Remember that American who busted billy in the beginning and was working with the Turks? What was that all about?

[Okeefenokee]

The turks are very fond of sodomizing westerners. They did it to Lawrence of Arabia. They tried doing it to that white guy at the end of Midnight Express, and they did it to Flynn. Sunrise, sunset.

It was implied, but not shown, that the guy in midnight express was sodomized by the warden from the very start. That scene at the end was when he finally got back at him.

Its been awhile since I've seen that movie, it may be time for a rewatch. Remember that American who busted billy in the beginning and was working with the Turks? What was that all about?

Don't remember. I liked that part about them not stabbing people above the waist, so they just go around stabbing each other in the ass cheek. Laughed hard at that.

[heydaralon]

It was implied, but not shown, that the guy in midnight express was sodomized by the warden from the very start. That scene at the end was when he finally got back at him.

Its been awhile since I've seen that movie, it may be time for a rewatch. Remember that American who busted billy in the beginning and was working with the Turks? What was that all about?

Don't remember. I liked that part about them not stabbing people above the waist, so they just go around stabbing each other in the ass cheek. Laughed hard at that.

It was a good movie thats for sure. The soundtrack was great too. I still listen to that chase song from time to time.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Still no one can answer the question that demands an answer. What is Russia getting now that they could not get from Obama/Clinton? Until you can answer that or present one shred of evidence, you have nothing and everyone knows it.

Here ya go, chuckles. Get out of your bubble.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/busi ... .html?_r=0

[kybkh]

Flynn spent his whole life in service of this great nation and risked his career to save it. Now you bunch of jolly cucks are reveling in this ridiculous witch hunt. When Trump sends out for names to be added to the list, I'll be sure you're on it!

[heydaralon]

Flynn spent his whole life in service of this great nation and risked his career to save it. Now you bunch of jolly cucks are reveling in this ridiculous witch hunt. When Trump sends out for names to be added to the list, I'll be sure you're on it!

Flynn spent a good deal of his career servicing various turkish generals by getting on all fours. He was a known homosexual as well. Not that I hold that against him, but his name was in the guestbook of every Turkish bathhouse. Flynn's asshole was so wide that you could fly a Greek fighter plane through it and still have room for an air traffic control tower. It got stretched like Turkish Taffy if you will...

[kybkh]

Bump for relevance.

This salt will never dissolve.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/ ... ynn-story/


Why would these leakers do it? The investigation of Flynn was initiated by high-level Obama officials who had access to tightly controlled and normally inaccessible information. “Obama advisers” were reportedly working directly with the FBI to investigate Flynn. Many of those advisers and other high officials had lost much in the electoral outcome and some might certainly have been seeking payback, while the lame-duck White House could have been looking for ways to preemptively weaken the incoming administration.

The FBI or NSA would have been recording the conversations of the Russian ambassador as a legitimate exercise of their authority, but the normal procedure involving inadvertent intercept of a soon-to-be high-ranking American would be to redact that part of the conversation or otherwise “minimize” it to conceal his or her identity. Leaking the classified information thus obtained to the media portraying Flynn, and by extension Trump, in a bad light would require reconstruction of the original documents and might be risky to carry out. Even if the enterprise could be seen as a good move politically if one were a Democrat, it would not pay to do it too directly, as someone might eventually backtrack and find out the source.

That being so, it might not be too preposterous to consider discreetly asking the Brits what they might have in a folder somewhere on calls and other contacts made by Flynn. As Flynn was known to be in touch with senior government officials all over the world, GCHQ might well have content or corroboration that NSA could have missed. Pull together enough “foreign sourced” stuff that way, imply something possibly untoward about all of it, send it on over to the CIA liaison, and you have a prima facie case that would satisfy the admittedly willing-to-be-convinced Obama Justice Department that Flynn might be up to something that could potentially damage national security.

[kybkh]

[kybkh]

[heydaralon]

Lets be honest here:

If Hillary had won and it became known that someone in her cabinet had been taking money from Saudi Arabia or somewhere, you would be up in arms about it. I don't know why you have such a hard on for this guy. You seem to have an excuse for anything and everything he does. Its very strange.