Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
Specific GyreProtected Tweets
@jimvannest
Joined July 2009
Tweet to Specific GyreMention Specific Gyre in a Tweet
This account's Tweets are protected.
Only confirmed followers have access to @jimvannest's Tweets and complete profile. Click the "Follow" button to send a follow request.
@jimvannest
Joined July 2009
Tweet to Specific GyreMention Specific Gyre in a Tweet
This account's Tweets are protected.
Only confirmed followers have access to @jimvannest's Tweets and complete profile. Click the "Follow" button to send a follow request.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 2:13 am
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
Has anyone met a vegan that wasn't crazy or very morally impaired somehow? B12 vitamins are important, folks.C-Mag wrote:Murderer identified as Nasim Aghdam, trusted PETA member known for leading many PETA protests.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
Kath wrote:Specific GyreProtected Tweets
@jimvannest
Joined July 2009
Tweet to Specific GyreMention Specific Gyre in a Tweet
This account's Tweets are protected.
Only confirmed followers have access to @jimvannest's Tweets and complete profile. Click the "Follow" button to send a follow request.
That's too bad. I could have given a recipe for gluten-free hat with tide pods.
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 7:24 pm
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
Jesus Christ I’m not fucking justifying it.Kath wrote:?? Where in the Youtube EULA is a content creator guaranteed a livelihood ?Viktorthepirate wrote: The decisions they make affect many many livelihood
They work with a ton of people. A ton of people = some are crazy. Make a decision that affects a crazy someone’s livelihood and they may do some crazy shit.
This is exacerbated by the fact that they never explain shit to anyone.
There is also a double standard that the shooter pointed out that is absolutely true. Miley Cyrus can swing on a wrecking ball literally naked but if she posts a risqué work out video she gets it put on a restricted list.
If you’re an organization that touches many many people, shit Like this happens.
What’s in the fuckig EULA doesn’t matter if you’re trying to avoid being shot by a crazy person.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
There’s a message you should expand to gun free zones and weapon bans.Viktorthepirate wrote:
What’s in the fuckig EULA doesn’t matter if you’re trying to avoid being shot by a crazy person.
Criminals don’t give a fuck about your EULA.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
Viktorthepirate wrote:Jesus Christ I’m not fucking justifying it.Kath wrote:?? Where in the Youtube EULA is a content creator guaranteed a livelihood ?Viktorthepirate wrote: The decisions they make affect many many livelihood
They work with a ton of people. A ton of people = some are crazy. Make a decision that affects a crazy someone’s livelihood and they may do some crazy shit.
This is exacerbated by the fact that they never explain shit to anyone.
There is also a double standard that the shooter pointed out that is absolutely true. Miley Cyrus can swing on a wrecking ball literally naked but if she posts a risqué work out video she gets it put on a restricted list.
If you’re an organization that touches many many people, shit Like this happens.
What’s in the fuckig EULA doesn’t matter if you’re trying to avoid being shot by a crazy person.
Her workout wasn't even risqué. She might have been a homicidal vegan, but I have not seen any evidence that she tried to play YouTube fitness thot.
-
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 7:24 pm
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
I’m against murder, and what she did isn’t justified. But she WAS justified in feeling aggrieved.Speaker to Animals wrote:Viktorthepirate wrote:Jesus Christ I’m not fucking justifying it.Kath wrote:
?? Where in the Youtube EULA is a content creator guaranteed a livelihood ?
They work with a ton of people. A ton of people = some are crazy. Make a decision that affects a crazy someone’s livelihood and they may do some crazy shit.
This is exacerbated by the fact that they never explain shit to anyone.
There is also a double standard that the shooter pointed out that is absolutely true. Miley Cyrus can swing on a wrecking ball literally naked but if she posts a risqué work out video she gets it put on a restricted list.
If you’re an organization that touches many many people, shit Like this happens.
What’s in the fuckig EULA doesn’t matter if you’re trying to avoid being shot by a crazy person.
Her workout wasn't even risqué. She might have been a homicidal vegan, but I have not seen any evidence that she tried to play YouTube fitness thot.
It’s the same reason I’m not a prick if I need to let someone go. I can be within my rights all day and it don’t mean shit if he comes back and puts a bullet in my head.
Likelihood of that happening in my place of work is very low. But if I dealt with the bazillion YouTube creators out there, my risk of pissing off a homicidal crazy person increases. And it increases further if my decisions are perceived as arbitrary. It doesn’t matter how lawful or justified my decisions are if someone shows up with a gun.
As Pompey said, “Don’t quote laws to men with swords”
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
I think the fact she published her videos in Farsi as well was a factor. YouTube probably wanted to protect Muslim girls from improper content.Speaker to Animals wrote:Viktorthepirate wrote:Jesus Christ I’m not fucking justifying it.Kath wrote:
?? Where in the Youtube EULA is a content creator guaranteed a livelihood ?
They work with a ton of people. A ton of people = some are crazy. Make a decision that affects a crazy someone’s livelihood and they may do some crazy shit.
This is exacerbated by the fact that they never explain shit to anyone.
There is also a double standard that the shooter pointed out that is absolutely true. Miley Cyrus can swing on a wrecking ball literally naked but if she posts a risqué work out video she gets it put on a restricted list.
If you’re an organization that touches many many people, shit Like this happens.
What’s in the fuckig EULA doesn’t matter if you’re trying to avoid being shot by a crazy person.
Her workout wasn't even risqué. She might have been a homicidal vegan, but I have not seen any evidence that she tried to play YouTube fitness thot.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
Yes, I've met plenty. I have also met Germans who aren't totalitarian psychos. Stop generalising Otern.Otern wrote:Has anyone met a vegan that wasn't crazy or very morally impaired somehow? B12 vitamins are important, folks.C-Mag wrote:Murderer identified as Nasim Aghdam, trusted PETA member known for leading many PETA protests.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Active Shooter at YouTube HQ
Hastur wrote:I think the fact she published her videos in Farsi as well was a factor. YouTube probably wanted to protect Muslim girls from improper content.Speaker to Animals wrote:Viktorthepirate wrote:
Jesus Christ I’m not fucking justifying it.
They work with a ton of people. A ton of people = some are crazy. Make a decision that affects a crazy someone’s livelihood and they may do some crazy shit.
This is exacerbated by the fact that they never explain shit to anyone.
There is also a double standard that the shooter pointed out that is absolutely true. Miley Cyrus can swing on a wrecking ball literally naked but if she posts a risqué work out video she gets it put on a restricted list.
If you’re an organization that touches many many people, shit Like this happens.
What’s in the fuckig EULA doesn’t matter if you’re trying to avoid being shot by a crazy person.
Her workout wasn't even risqué. She might have been a homicidal vegan, but I have not seen any evidence that she tried to play YouTube fitness thot.
If that's what happened, and it is confirmed and gets out into the public, Google is going to eat massive crow.