America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
I certainly hope it's that easy.
-
- Posts: 18728
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
As Emperor Hash, I will make it so.Speaker to Animals wrote:I certainly hope it's that easy.
p.s. Really, fighting vested self-interest is the impossible job, not the technical stuff.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
Martin Hash wrote:As Emperor Hash, I will make it so.Speaker to Animals wrote:I certainly hope it's that easy.
p.s. Really, fighting vested self-interest is the impossible job, not the technical stuff.
We'd need quite a lot of nuclear power plants to produce the same amount of electricity that is equivalent to what we burn in fossil fuels for transportation.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
I mean.. realistically, we could build as many nuclear power plants as needed. I still think it would be better to distribute the population into smaller communities and connect them with maglev rail or something along those lines. We shouldn't be transporting cargo on the highways like we do.
I have always liked the idea of creating a cargo pipeline network that routes pods sort of like how we route IP packets.
I have always liked the idea of creating a cargo pipeline network that routes pods sort of like how we route IP packets.
-
- Posts: 25283
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
That's more or less what the railroad system does. Making it maglev would be astronomically expensive. Probably the annual budget of the MIC for a year.Speaker to Animals wrote:I mean.. realistically, we could build as many nuclear power plants as needed. I still think it would be better to distribute the population into smaller communities and connect them with maglev rail or something along those lines. We shouldn't be transporting cargo on the highways like we do.
I have always liked the idea of creating a cargo pipeline network that routes pods sort of like how we route IP packets.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
GrumpyCatFace wrote:That's more or less what the railroad system does. Making it maglev would be astronomically expensive. Probably the annual budget of the MIC for a year.Speaker to Animals wrote:I mean.. realistically, we could build as many nuclear power plants as needed. I still think it would be better to distribute the population into smaller communities and connect them with maglev rail or something along those lines. We shouldn't be transporting cargo on the highways like we do.
I have always liked the idea of creating a cargo pipeline network that routes pods sort of like how we route IP packets.
It's nothing like what the railroad does. Not the same thing at all. You don't understand what I was talking about.
-
- Posts: 25283
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
Long haul freight trains don’t take everything to a single destination. They go to freight yards (routers), and each car is routed to the next train (link) toward the destination, or offloaded onto trucks (subnets).Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:That's more or less what the railroad system does. Making it maglev would be astronomically expensive. Probably the annual budget of the MIC for a year.Speaker to Animals wrote:I mean.. realistically, we could build as many nuclear power plants as needed. I still think it would be better to distribute the population into smaller communities and connect them with maglev rail or something along those lines. We shouldn't be transporting cargo on the highways like we do.
I have always liked the idea of creating a cargo pipeline network that routes pods sort of like how we route IP packets.
It's nothing like what the railroad does. Not the same thing at all. You don't understand what I was talking about.
Also, they’re all electric-driven. Diesel just runs the generator in the engine. It’s the same thing.
-
- Posts: 18728
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
20th Century thinking. Autonomous vehicles don’t need rails. Where people live is immaterial.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Long haul freight trains don’t take everything to a single destination. They go to freight yards (routers), and each car is routed to the next train (link) toward the destination, or offloaded onto trucks (subnets).Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
That's more or less what the railroad system does. Making it maglev would be astronomically expensive. Probably the annual budget of the MIC for a year.
It's nothing like what the railroad does. Not the same thing at all. You don't understand what I was talking about.
Also, they’re all electric-driven. Diesel just runs the generator in the engine. It’s the same thing.
Uh huh..
Which is not comparable at all.
The degree of the nodes is your problem. I want more nodes with lower degrees, more connections overall but not necessarily huge hubs like a rail yard, and smaller pods that are automatically routed. No need to connect cars to train engines. Trains don't work anything like that.
All that should matter is that a pod has an end destination. You don't have to latch a series of them together. You just put it in the system and it gets routed automatically, with various load-balancing and traffic management algorithms doing the optimization and routing. It doesn't run on fossil fuels. It doesn't impact surface traffic. You could even have connections down the house level.
I.e. not a fucking train system at all.
-
- Posts: 25283
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: America’s forgotten towns: Can they be saved or should people just leave?
Yes, I know what you're talking about. Approximately 5 million miles of elevated track, going to every large town in America, with self-propelled freight cars, directed by a routing system.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Long haul freight trains don’t take everything to a single destination. They go to freight yards (routers), and each car is routed to the next train (link) toward the destination, or offloaded onto trucks (subnets).Speaker to Animals wrote:
It's nothing like what the railroad does. Not the same thing at all. You don't understand what I was talking about.
Also, they’re all electric-driven. Diesel just runs the generator in the engine. It’s the same thing.
Uh huh..
Which is not comparable at all.
The degree of the nodes is your problem. I want more nodes with lower degrees, more connections overall but not necessarily huge hubs like a rail yard, and smaller pods that are automatically routed. No need to connect cars to train engines. Trains don't work anything like that.
All that should matter is that a pod has an end destination. You don't have to latch a series of them together. You just put it in the system and it gets routed automatically, with various load-balancing and traffic management algorithms doing the optimization and routing. It doesn't run on fossil fuels. It doesn't impact surface traffic. You could even have connections down the house level.
I.e. not a fucking train system at all.
And I'm telling you that it would be obscenely expensive. We're already broke, dude.