Post
by doc_loliday » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:02 pm
If you look at my response within the context of who I was responding to it shouldn't be that hard to understand what I'm saying. jbird said it was boom/bust, then unprecedented growth. So when I said it wasn't steady I was referring to his comment. Sure, steady could mean overall growth, but again if you look at the context of who I was responding to, it's pretty clear I was not making a brand new point.
If you want to talk about a different topic, like why production changed, we can do that too. Production wasn't due to politicians, it has to do with the nature of the economy, the technology increases and access and ability to use new resources that permitted those changes, which is the same reason why production possibilities have always expanded. In this instance, electrification is probably one of, if not, the most radical technologies created, and it helped kick off a massive economic multiplier. But again, the business cycle was there before and after the great depression.