Well, even if you do, you'll quickly run into a situation where it flips the other way, the cop will wait out, get taken down, then a bunch of innocent people will get lit up by a real deal mad shooter, and then the same people screeching here will be screeching about that.Viktorthepirate wrote:And do we ask the police to take those risks?Smitty-48 wrote:See the reality here is that the cop did not actually plead self defense per se, he pleaded public safety, said he thought the woman was in peril too, if he allowed the suspect to draw.
And that's what the judge is saying, he's not just responsible for defending himself, he's got everybody in the hotel on his watch there.
If it does turn out to be a mad shooter interrupted in the process of going on a rampage, they can't let that by, they can't let themselves get taken down.
Mad shooter scenario:
Call received, no reports of gun fire. Witnesses are credible however and perhaps the shooter is just preparing to begin.
Do we tell them the police they need to be prepared to take a bullet in that situation by assuming a different ROE based on threat assessment?
If you're gonna cave in to the fickle mob of torches and pitchforks, then you're damned if you don't, damned if you do.