TheReal_ND wrote:Because the media knows most people won't read it and will tell you what it means.
I haven't read it either tbh. From what I understand it doesn't even go far enough for me. 90 day ban? Big whoop.
Gen. Kelly has said that the 90 days is expedient until they get the new vetting procedures in place, but that doesn't mean those countries are coming off the list in 90 days, "not coming off anytime soon" and "more countries may be added once we look at the vetting" was what he said IIRC.
Neat
Anybody else notice that lil' Kimmy over in best Korea has been keeping his head down? You would think that if he was doing any saber rattling recently the media would have lost their minds.
Rattle his ass,
We gon' make NK Korea again.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
I thought it was illegal for Euros to cut so deep?
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama
Now that Trump is in charge and signing executive orders the media suddenly seems concerned about the constitution and how much power the POTUS should really have in this area. The same partisan hacks laid low or even supported Obama while he openly violated the constitution on a regular basis.
Yet again they are showing just how biased and unreliable they are.
PartyOf5 wrote:Now that Trump is in charge and signing executive orders the media suddenly seems concerned about the constitution and how much power the POTUS should really have in this area. The same partisan hacks laid low or even supported Obama while he openly violated the constitution on a regular basis.
Yet again they are showing just how biased and unreliable they are.
Fox was in a constant state of bitch about Obama's over-reach. Same/same... partisans do this every time power changes.
When an R is president, the Rs are fine with executive overreach and Ds are against it.
When a D is president,m the Ds are fine with executive overreach and the Rs are against it.
Postby Speaker to Animals » Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:16 pm
Kath wrote:Tillerson confirmed. Any non-partisan thoughts on having an oil exec in charge of foreign relations? Disclaimer - the last SoC I liked was Powell.
Depends upon his loyalties and disposition. With his connections, you could either have increased supply of oil or decreased supply. Having a guy with deep connections in the world's energy and natural resource markets isn't by itself a bad thing at all.
