Degenerate Faggots Starting Civil War2.0

[Smitty-48]

This seems more correct.

Except the part about the Zionists' intent from the start being the overthrow of the Arabs and the creation of a Jewish state. They were there for fifty years getting ready for it. It was their goal from the start, and they didn't even hide that fact.

The US colonists didn't show up on day one in the Americas, and start going on about how they were gonna throw off the rule of the King. The people funding the colonial adventures in England weren't working in the British government and openly campaigning for the removal of Monarchical rule of the King's colonies.

These aren't the same thing.

Not so, it's exactly the same, the British Empire invoked a multicultural America, Colonists and Indians living side by side in harmony, the colonists would have their land, the Indians would have land set aside for them, this is exactly what the British invoked in the Balfour Declaration, multicultural Palestine, the Jews would have their land, and the Arabs would have theirs as well, and they would live in harmony under the management of the British Empire.

The British actually had no interest in allowing the Jews to have an Israel, it was the Arabs who were important to the British, the Arabs were sitting on the oil after all, and so the British were actually protecting the Arabs, from the Zionists who wanted to overthrow British Imperial rule in Palestine, by force of arms, to make an Israel, through military conquest.

[Okeefenokee]

Important to the British Army, not to the British government.

[Smitty-48]

Important to the British Army, not to the British government.

The British Army is not the British Government? Now you're going full retard, obviously the British military proxies in America and Arabia, were proxies of the British Crown, as were the American Colonists and the Palestine Zionists, but in both cases, it became a case of the British refusing to choose between them, wanting to have it both ways, in the Interests of the Empire, and so the American Colonists took all the land by military conquest, just as the Israeli Zionists would take all the land by military conquest as well, "Indians" and "Palestinians", being ethnically cleansed off the land, by force of arms.

Both Revolutionary Wars, actually against the British Crown, for trying to have it both ways, in the interests of the Empire, over the interests of the ethnic cleansers.

[TheReal_ND]

I'm more interested in the why of the Balfour declaration. Give me a quick rundown on how the Jews Jewed the crown into giving a fuck.

[Smitty-48]

Yes, Nuke, this is where your "International Zionist Conspiracy" can come into play, because the Balfour Declaration, was also the Rothschild Declaration. Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, was who the letter was addressed to.

[Okeefenokee]

Important to the British Army, not to the British government.

The British Army is not the British Government? Now you're going full retard, obviously the British military proxies in America and Arabia, were proxies of the British Crown, as were the American Colonists and the Palestine Zionists, but in both cases, it became a case of the British refusing to choose between them, wanting to have it both ways, in the Interests of the Empire, and so the American Colonists took all the land by military conquest, just as the Israeli Zionists would take all the land by military consquest as well, "Indians" and "Palestinians", being ethnically cleansed off the land, by force of arms.

You're not paying attention to, or you're ignoring intentionally, the point I'm making. The Zionists didn't take Palestine from the Arabs. They still don't have it. They spent fifty years getting ready to take it, all the while being protected from expulsion by outside protectors, and when it came time to do the thing, they stopped short of the finish line. The Arabs are not the Indians. Without the French and the British, there would be no Israel. There would have been an Arab nation of Palestine in 1919, and the Zionists would have been relocating to Madagascar.

[TheReal_ND]

Yes, Nuke, this is where your "International Zionist Conspiracy" can come into play, because the Balfour Declaration, was also the Rothschild Declaration.

[Smitty-48]

Important to the British Army, not to the British government.

The British Army is not the British Government? Now you're going full retard, obviously the British military proxies in America and Arabia, were proxies of the British Crown, as were the American Colonists and the Palestine Zionists, but in both cases, it became a case of the British refusing to choose between them, wanting to have it both ways, in the Interests of the Empire, and so the American Colonists took all the land by military conquest, just as the Israeli Zionists would take all the land by military consquest as well, "Indians" and "Palestinians", being ethnically cleansed off the land, by force of arms.

You're not paying attention to, or you're ignoring intentionally, the point I'm making. The Zionists didn't take Palestine from the Arabs. They still don't have it. They spent fifty years getting ready to take it, all the while being protected from expulsion by outside protectors, and when it came time to do the thing, they stopped short of the finish line. The Arabs are not the Indians. Without the French and the British, there would be no Israel. There would have been an Arab nation of Palestine in 1919, and the Zionists would have been relocating to Madagascar.

Without the French and British, there would be no America neither, so you're just making my point for me, the only difference with the Israelis, is that they are massively outnumbered by their Indians, and it's only early days yet, the United States had certainly not consolidated its position by 1845, in 1845, most of America was still Mexican and Indian, not American.

[Okeefenokee]

The British Army is not the British Government? Now you're going full retard, obviously the British military proxies in America and Arabia, were proxies of the British Crown, as were the American Colonists and the Palestine Zionists, but in both cases, it became a case of the British refusing to choose between them, wanting to have it both ways, in the Interests of the Empire, and so the American Colonists took all the land by military conquest, just as the Israeli Zionists would take all the land by military consquest as well, "Indians" and "Palestinians", being ethnically cleansed off the land, by force of arms.

You're not paying attention to, or you're ignoring intentionally, the point I'm making. The Zionists didn't take Palestine from the Arabs. They still don't have it. They spent fifty years getting ready to take it, all the while being protected from expulsion by outside protectors, and when it came time to do the thing, they stopped short of the finish line. The Arabs are not the Indians. Without the French and the British, there would be no Israel. There would have been an Arab nation of Palestine in 1919, and the Zionists would have been relocating to Madagascar.

Without the French and British, there would be no America neither, so you're just making my point for me, the only difference with the Israelis, is that they are massively outnumbered by their Indians, and it's only early days yet, the United States had certainly not consolidated its position by 1845, in 1845, most of America was still Mexican and Indian, not American.

Alright, if we're gonna look at it that way, I'll agree it's still early by comparison. We went from Jamestown to independence in 170 years. Got almost 241 years since then. But I'm applying a handicap to those numbers. Things happen a lot faster these days. We've got airplanes and internet.

[Smitty-48]

69 years in, America, was really just a Giant Sized White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Israel, 69 years in, Israel is really just a Mini Jewish America, as America was in 1845.