Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

[StCapps]

If you do censor me or anyone else, going forward, for no good reason

So there are good reasons.

Perhaps, but when the moderator herself violates those same "reasons" on the regular, it crosses over into abuse and pettiness.

*yip*

[DrYouth]

No I am reacting like you moderated four posts on this forum for no good reason and then threatened to censor me and Smitty for talking hockey. If you did moderate hundreds of posts for no reason, and then threatened to censor me and Smitty for talking hockey, you really would never ever hear the end of it until you left the forum in disgrace or stepped down as moderator to put us on ignore.

Uh wait...

According what has been presented here...

Kath threatened you, not for talking hockey, but for refusing to take your hockey talk to an appropriate thread.
That would be in the job description of "moderator" - not the threatening but the asking...
Your responsibility as a member of the forum would be to do the right thing and respect the thread... which you didn't do.

And what was censored was ClubGops pedo porn... not really a big loss to the forum when you think about it.

So all your whining doesn't really add up to much here.

But go ahead a wage an endless jihad against Kath for this insult to your sacred liberty.

I understand this jihad will earn you an eternity of glory... and virgins... though of what gender these virgins might be is unspecified.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

So there are good reasons.

Perhaps, but when the moderator herself violates those same "reasons" on the regular, it crosses over into abuse and pettiness.

*yip*

Still, if one is going to take a principled stand for liberty by abandoning politeness, it looks like we really just wind up with neither, don't it?

Mandatory politeness for all!

[StCapps]

It means you are making distinctions that don't actually differentiate between the two terms, while thinking you are for some strange reason.

Right, now try quoting where I supposedly do that?

Deleting a post of someone calling someone else a pedophile to rile them up or insult them, is not censorship. It's moderation.

It's both, yet you are trying to pretend it's only moderation, even though it also clearly censorship.

[K@th]

I'd like to see the post where I accused STA of being a child fucker PLUS went into graphic detail of how he accomplishes those goals.

The "child fucker" part isn't enough - I need to see the graphic details. If I did that, I'll delete it. But, I've never even accused you of such things, so, you're talking about shit that never happened.

[StCapps]

No I am reacting like you moderated four posts on this forum for no good reason and then threatened to censor me and Smitty for talking hockey. If you did moderate hundreds of posts for no reason, and then threatened to censor me and Smitty for talking hockey, you really would never ever hear the end of it until you left the forum in disgrace or stepped down as moderator to put us on ignore.

Uh wait...

According what has been presented here...

Kath threatened you, not for talking hockey, but for refusing to take your hockey talk to an appropriate thread.
That would be in the job description of "moderator" - not the threatening but the asking...
Your responsibility as a member of the forum would be to do the right thing and respect the thread... which you didn't do.

And what was censored was ClubGops pedo porn... not really a big loss to the forum when you think about it.

So all your whining doesn't really add up to much here.

But go ahead a wage an endless jihad against Kath for this insult to your sacred liberty.

I understand this jihad will earn you an eternity of glory... and virgins... though of what gender these virgins might be is unspecified.

Kath didn't just ask nicely, she literally threatened to censor me and Smitty if we posted hockey talk in her safe space. She was threatening and asking, when it was just asking, that was fine and I eventually would have listened, same-same with Smitty, then she escalated because she was butthurt that I didn't immediately take her advice.

Not respecting the thread is nothing burger, threats of censorship by a moderator for not posting like she wishes I would, that's a big deal. That is what is being presented here, and if you think otherwise it's because you are siding with Kath and Monte's version of events, while disregarding Capps and Smitty's version of the events.

[StCapps]

I'd like to see the post where I accused STA of being a child fucker PLUS went into graphic detail of how he accomplishes those goals.

The "child fucker" part isn't enough - I need to see the graphic details. If I did that, I'll delete it. But, I've never even accused you of such things, so, you're talking about shit that never happened.

I posted graphic details of you fucking children in the ass with strapon, yet no censorship. You are incapable of moderating out of principle, you do it all on feelz, with no consistent enforcement of the rules.

[K@th]

via Imgflip Meme Generator

[BjornP]

Still, if one is going to take a principled stand for liberty by abandoning politeness, it looks like we really just wind up with neither, don't it?

Mandatory politeness for all!

An armed society is a polite society. MHF just needs gun drones connected to each account that will fly in through your window and start shooting your home to shreds if you cross the forum disciplinarians.

[K@th]

I'd like to see the post where I accused STA of being a child fucker PLUS went into graphic detail of how he accomplishes those goals.

The "child fucker" part isn't enough - I need to see the graphic details. If I did that, I'll delete it. But, I've never even accused you of such things, so, you're talking about shit that never happened.

I posted graphic details of you fucking children in the ass with strapon, yet no censorship. You are incapable of moderating out of principle, you do it all on feelz, with no consistent enforcement of the rules.

You are actively trying to get me to mod your posts. Transparent troll is transparent.