What left-field on what ballpark, on what planet, are you coming from today?Speaker to Animals wrote:For instance, why not legalize weed like the drug addicts demand, but require that they get a license to purchase it. But getting the license gets you removed from voter registrations and blocks you from purchasing or owning firearms?
Just think of all the great things we can accomplish when we say fuck it and ignore the Constitution!
LET'S BAN GUNS!
-
- Posts: 14791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
Typical NRA mentality. ‘Shootings aren’t a problem, so no need to think about solutions- OMGZORZZFASCISTS!’The Conservative wrote:What left-field on what ballpark, on what planet, are you coming from today?Speaker to Animals wrote:For instance, why not legalize weed like the drug addicts demand, but require that they get a license to purchase it. But getting the license gets you removed from voter registrations and blocks you from purchasing or owning firearms?
Just think of all the great things we can accomplish when we say fuck it and ignore the Constitution!
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
It’s not. It’s not even remotely close.The Conservative wrote:The healthcare is cheaper doing it that way, than dealing with 500 injured and 58 dead...GrumpyCatFace wrote:Ok then.. now reconcile this new, expensive health coverage with the OMG COMMUNIZUM hysteria over public healthcare. Because insurance companies do not seem keen to cover any sort of lifetime mental care.
-
- Posts: 14791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
One Emergency Room visit threw my wife and I into debt of a sum of $3500. That was with 80% covered. You do the math.GrumpyCatFace wrote:It’s not. It’s not even remotely close.The Conservative wrote:The healthcare is cheaper doing it that way, than dealing with 500 injured and 58 dead...GrumpyCatFace wrote:Ok then.. now reconcile this new, expensive health coverage with the OMG COMMUNIZUM hysteria over public healthcare. Because insurance companies do not seem keen to cover any sort of lifetime mental care.
That was for one night dealing with a Thyroid attack for my wife.
Last edited by The Conservative on Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Typical NRA mentality. ‘Shootings aren’t a problem, so no need to think about solutions- OMGZORZZFASCISTS!’The Conservative wrote:What left-field on what ballpark, on what planet, are you coming from today?Speaker to Animals wrote:For instance, why not legalize weed like the drug addicts demand, but require that they get a license to purchase it. But getting the license gets you removed from voter registrations and blocks you from purchasing or owning firearms?
Just think of all the great things we can accomplish when we say fuck it and ignore the Constitution!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
Oh, we only want to violate the constitution when it hurts people we don't like. It's not fair when people suggest the state ought to violate our constitutional rights. Gotcha.
-
- Posts: 14791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
Ok, make sense... because you aren't.Speaker to Animals wrote:Oh, we only want to violate the constitution when it hurts people we don't like. It's not fair when people suggest the state ought to violate our constitutional rights. Gotcha.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
Go home aspie.
-
- Posts: 14791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: LET'S BAN GUNS!
Yes, now multiply that by 300 millionish. Compared to 500 gunshot wounds? The "cheaper" option is obvious.The Conservative wrote:One Emergency Room visit threw my wife and I into debt of a sum of $3500. That was with 80% covered. You do the math.GrumpyCatFace wrote:It’s not. It’s not even remotely close.The Conservative wrote:
The healthcare is cheaper doing it that way, than dealing with 500 injured and 58 dead...
That was for one night dealing with a Thyroid attack for my wife.