Connecticut

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Ph64 » Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:28 am

The Conservative wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:46 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:41 am
Sales taxes on food are evil. Weird how republicans do not make a national issue out of what kind of shit heads would tax food, further driving poor people into poverty. Oh wait..
I have no issue on getting taxed on what you buy. I have an issue on getting taxed then taxed again on money already taxed.
CT has an income tax, so you're taxed for both earning the money and again when you spend it. And if you don't spend it you'll get taxed on it when you die (inheritance tax).

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:31 am

If you are going to have consumption taxes at all, they need to be the only taxes, and you should exempt necessities like food, medicine, and clothing (or have some universal income scheme to offset the tax burden on poor people).

When you have this mixed nightmare tax system like we have today, the poor are taxed several times more than the middle class, and many times more than the wealthy in terms of percentages of their income. Sales taxes as they exist in the United States are among the most regressive in the world and are a direct redistribution of wealth from the poor to the wealthy.

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by Zlaxer » Thu Jun 18, 2020 12:18 pm

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.couran ... utType=amp


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnew ... cna1231018


A bunch of 13-25 year old females are about to get redpilled.

Bye bye title 10 :lol: rollyclown

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Ph64 » Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:04 pm

Zlaxer wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 12:18 pm
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.couran ... utType=amp


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnew ... cna1231018


A bunch of 13-25 year old females are about to get redpilled.

Bye bye title 10 :lol: rollyclown
AFAIK the two transgender "female" track competitors both have their penises (penii?) and balls.
I think plainly they should get those chopped off before we consider their entry into "women's" track.
"People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome."

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18720
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Martin Hash » Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:53 pm

Transgender means they keep their dick

Transsexual is when they cut it off

This was a “transgender” ruling
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by The Conservative » Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:51 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:53 pm
Transgender means they keep their dick

Transsexual is when they cut it off

This was a “transgender” ruling
If they still have it, they shouldn't be able to compete. Period.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Connecticut

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Jun 18, 2020 7:18 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:53 pm
Transgender means they keep their dick

Transsexual is when they cut it off

This was a “transgender” ruling
Tell that to the sweet transvestite from transsexual Transylvania.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by clubgop » Thu Jun 18, 2020 11:20 pm

The Conservative wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:51 pm
Martin Hash wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:53 pm
Transgender means they keep their dick

Transsexual is when they cut it off

This was a “transgender” ruling
If they still have it, they shouldn't be able to compete. Period.
What difference does that make?

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by The Conservative » Fri Jun 19, 2020 4:35 am

clubgop wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 11:20 pm
The Conservative wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:51 pm
Martin Hash wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 5:53 pm
Transgender means they keep their dick

Transsexual is when they cut it off

This was a “transgender” ruling
If they still have it, they shouldn't be able to compete. Period.
What difference does that make?
Testosterone.

Also, are you seriously defending letting a genetic make run in a woman’s sport?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by clubgop » Fri Jun 19, 2020 7:15 am

The Conservative wrote:
Fri Jun 19, 2020 4:35 am
clubgop wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 11:20 pm
The Conservative wrote:
Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:51 pm


If they still have it, they shouldn't be able to compete. Period.
What difference does that make?
Testosterone.

Also, are you seriously defending letting a genetic make run in a woman’s sport?
Then testes would be the issue not the penis. Also doesn't matter at that point. Still not an equal playing field. Some of the most formative years were spent on hormone levels that if a biological female were to experience she would be 1. dead 2. kicked out of the sport for doping.