What I'm saying is that if we assume that the Russian link here is false, then one has to truly think what that would mean and which kind of conspiracy are we talking about.Dand wrote:You're right, my FBI statement went too far. I hadn't read that story yet and was basing it on what they said before that. There still is not a consensus on the situation though.Not sure if you're saying that ironically or not but I hope they'll give some evidence too if they have it.ssu wrote:
Yeah, hope they would give some evidence. I'm all open for it.
Have a guy like the Marine officer who was an actual weapons inspector in Iraq who before the Iraqi invasion said that there was no WMD program, that actually the WMD's were destroyed. Because in Washington, there's allways the leaks. And such vast conspiracy that so many services get behind...
Then you have to make some assumptions here:
- That not only one, but many intelligence services would be willing to fabricate this thing even after Trump has won the election (and hence will be President)
- Why Republican Senate Intelligence Committee members would go with this "hoax" just to serve what? Play it for the Democrats that lost the elections?
- If this was just a Clinton Spin Machine "Look Squirrell!" distraction and baseless accusation, why would it continue now? Again, why would informed Republican senators go with this?
- Why would some Russian Kremlin insider brag about that they "helped Wikipedia"?
- Above all, why wouldn't there be the hints from people inside the intelligence services there is a major bullshit campaign underway?
- There is logic for the Russians to intervene in the US elections. They already have supported political sides beneficial to them in other Western countries.
